Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270226›Full record

SynthesisSkeletal radiology2020

Percutaneous thermal ablation for treatment of osteoid osteoma: a systematic review and analysis.

Will S Lindquester, John Crowley, C Matthew Hawkins

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Will S LindquesterDepartment of Radiology, Univeristy of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian University Hospital, Suite E204 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. wlindquester@gmail.com.
John CrowleyDepartment of Radiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Ave., Radiology Department, 2nd Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
C Matthew HawkinsDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USEmory University · USUPMC Presbyterian · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough radiofrequency ablation is well validated for treatment of osteoid osteoma, newer technologies, namely cryoablation, have been less thoroughly studied. The purpose is to perform a systematic review and pooled analysis of percutaneous ablation technologies for treatment of osteoid osteoma with subset analysis of intra-articular and spinal tumors. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 36 of 79 identified manuscripts met inclusion criteria, comprising 1863 ablations in 1798 patients. Inclusion criteria were (1) retrospective or prospective analysis of thermal ablation of osteoid osteomas in any location, (2) at least 6 months of clinical follow-up, (3) 10 or more patients, (4) patients not included in a second study included in this review, and (5) English language or English translation available. Success rate was defined as all ablations minus technical failures, clinical failures, and recurrences. Subset analysis of intra-articular and spinal tumors was performed.

resultsOverall success rate was 91.9% (95% CI 91-93%). Technical failure, clinical failure, and recurrence rates were 0.3%, 2.1%, and 5.6% respectively. Complications were seen in 2.5% (95% CI 1.9-3.3%) patients. There was no significant difference when comparing radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation (p = 0.92). Success rates for intra-articular (radiofrequency ablation) and spinal tumors (radiofrequency and cryoablation) were 97% and 91.6% respectively.

conclusionPercutaneous ablation of osteoid osteomas was highly successful with low complication rates. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation is similar, which is consequential because cryoablation is associated with decreased pain, predictable nerve regeneration, and theoretical immunotherapy benefits. Treatment of more challenging intra-articular and spinal lesions demonstrated similarly high success and low complication rates.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCatheter AblationOsteoma, OsteoidHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeBone tumorCryoablationMeta-analysisMicrowave ablationOsteoid osteomaPercutaneous ablationRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID32270226
OpenAlexW3015504074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.