ArticleDer Anaesthesist2020
[Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia associated with an early endoprosthesis infection].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare disease characteristically involving eosinophilic infiltration of lung parenchyma as well as fever, dyspnea, and coughing. A differentiation is made between primary and secondary AEP depending on the underlying etiology. Substances that most frequently cause secondary AEP are antibiotics, such as the lipopeptide daptomycin. This is a case report about a 69-year-old female patient who underwent antibiotic treatment with daptomycin for an infection of a knee prosthesis. During the treatment, signs of pneumonia developed and included the increased dependence on mechanical ventilation of the previously intubated patient, infiltrates on a chest X‑ray, fever, and an increase in serum inflammation markers. Proof of bacteria as an underlying pathogen was not possible. A thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan showed opacities that are commonly seen in interstitial lung disease. Termination of daptomycin treatment due to renal failure led to an improvement of pulmonary symptoms. Re-exposure to daptomycin resulted in a recurrence of the symptoms. The diagnostic criteria for AEP according to Uppal et al. include 1) current exposure to daptomycin, 2) dyspnea with increased oxygen requirements or necessity for mechanical ventilation, 3) new infiltrates on chest X‑ray or CT scan, 4) bronchoalveolar lavage with eosinophilia >25%, 5) improvement of clinical symptoms following daptomycin withdrawal, and 6) fever. With 5 out of the 6 criteria by Uppal et al. positive-an eosinophilia >25% being the only unmet criteria-an AEP induced by daptomycin was diagnosed. Withdrawal of daptomycin as well as high-dose cortisol bolus treatment led to a rapid recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.