Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270084›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT2018

Cross-cultural adaptation of Dimensions of Corporate Safety Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language.

Liliana Andolpho Magalhães Guimarães, João Massuda, Rodrigo Bornhausen Demarch, Alberto José Niituma Ogata, Fernando Faleiros de Oliveira, Alfredo Almeida Pina-Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cross-cultural adaptation of Dimensions of Corporate Well-Being Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liliana Andolpho Magalhães GuimarãesGraduate Program in Psychology, Dom Bosco Catholic University (Universidade Católica Dom Bosco - UCDB) - Campo Grande (MS), Brazil.
João MassudaGraduate Program in Psychology, Dom Bosco Catholic University (Universidade Católica Dom Bosco - UCDB) - Campo Grande (MS), Brazil.
Rodrigo Bornhausen DemarchHealth and Innovation Board, Mantris Corporate Health Management - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Alberto José Niituma OgataHealth at Work Promotion Technical Committee, National Association of Occupational Medicine (Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho - ANAMT) - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Fernando Faleiros de OliveiraGraduate Program in Psychology, Dom Bosco Catholic University (Universidade Católica Dom Bosco - UCDB) - Campo Grande (MS), Brazil.
Alfredo Almeida Pina-OliveiraGraduate Program in Nursing, Guarulhos University (Universidade Guarulhos - UNG) - Guarulhos (SP), Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA broad-scoped approach to the assessment, documentation and application of health inputs at the workplace is needed to perform effective interventions, reduce occupational hazards and promote workers' health and safety. Effective efforts might thus be organized into programs and initiatives to preserve and improve the health and safety of workers.

objectiveTo perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Dimensions of Corporate Safety Scorecard for use in Brazil to broaden the scope of means to approach and measure the effectiveness of workplace safety actions.

methodsThe translation and cultural adaptation of the Dimensions of Corporate Safety Scorecard followed recommendations applied in similar studies which establish six steps: foreword translation, reconciliation, back translation, review by internal committee, cultural evaluation of the translation by an external expert panel (pretest) and final review.

resultsAdoption of the described procedure enabled a detailed analysis of possible options in case of divergences in statements between versions. Thus the quality of the results was ensured and the semantic qualities of the original version were preserved in the translation.

conclusionsThe Brazilian Portuguese version of Dimensions of Corporate Safety Scorecard, entitled "Questionário sobre Dimensões da Segurança Corporativa," obtained in the present study represents the first step in the use of this instrument for measurement of the effectiveness of health, safety and well-being actions in different work environments.

Indexed as

occupational healthsafetysurveys and questionnairestranslationworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID32270084
PMCPMC7104841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.