Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270049›Full record

ReviewEmerging topics in life sciences2019

Network modeling of single-cell omics data: challenges, opportunities, and progresses.

Montgomery Blencowe, Douglas Arneson, Jessica Ding, Yen-Wei Chen, Zara Saleem, Xia Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Gene Regulatory Networks in Coronary Artery Disease.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Network-based approaches for modeling disease regulation and progression.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Montgomery BlencoweDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A.
Douglas ArnesonDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A.
Jessica DingDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A.
Yen-Wei ChenDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A.
Zara SaleemDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A.
Xia YangDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-3971-038X

Funding

DHA Reverses Gene Network Signatures of Fructose-induced Metabolic SyndromeR01DK104363 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YANG, XIA · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Cell-specific novel genomic biomarkers of TBI pathologyR21NS103088 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GOMEZ-PINILLA, FERNANDO, YANG, XIA · 2017 to 2018
$406k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104363NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS103088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell multi-omics technologies are rapidly evolving, prompting both methodological advances and biological discoveries at an unprecedented speed. Gene regulatory network modeling has been used as a powerful approach to elucidate the complex molecular interactions underlying biological processes and systems, yet its application in single-cell omics data modeling has been met with unique challenges and opportunities. In this review, we discuss these challenges and opportunities, and offer an overview of the recent development of network modeling approaches designed to capture dynamic networks, within-cell networks, and cell-cell interaction or communication networks. Finally, we outline the remaining gaps in single-cell gene network modeling and the outlooks of the field moving forward.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationDatabases, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalSingle-Cell AnalysisSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID32270049
PMCPMC7141415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.