Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270015›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Streamlining the KOOS Activities of Daily Living Subscale Using Machine Learning.

Ashim Gupta, Ajish S R Potty, Deepak Ganta, R Justin Mistovich, Sreeram Penna, Craig Cady, Anish G Potty

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06608134 (Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Allograft Injections for), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06608134 early_phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Allograft Injections for

TypeinterventionalSponsorR3 Medical ResearchRan2024 to 2029Enrolled120ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsUmbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Allograft Intra-articular Knee Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashim GuptaSouth Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute, Laredo, Texas, USA.
Ajish S R PottySouth Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute, Laredo, Texas, USA.
Deepak GantaSchool of Engineering, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas, USA.
R Justin MistovichDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sreeram PennaRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Craig CadyDepartment of Biology, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Anish G PottySouth Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute, Laredo, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Functional outcome scores provide valuable data, yet they can be burdensome to patients and require significant resources to administer. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and is validated for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction outcomes. The KOOS requires 42 questions in 5 subscales. We utilized a machine learning (ML) algorithm to determine whether the number of questions and the resultant burden to complete the survey can be lowered in a subset (activities of daily living; ADL) of KOOS, yet still provide identical data. Hypothesis: Fewer questions than the 17 currently provided are actually needed to predict KOOS ADL subscale scores with high accuracy. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Pre- and postoperative patient-reported KOOS ADL scores were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) data registry for patients who had ACL reconstruction. Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) ML models were built to analyze each question and its value in predicting the patient's actual functional outcome (ie, KOOS ADL score). A streamlined set of minimal essential questions were then identified. Results: The SOS registry contained 6185 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. A total of 2525 patients between the age of 16 and 50 years had completed KOOS ADL scores presurgically and 3 months postoperatively. The data set consisted of 51.84% male patients and 48.16% female patients, with a mean age of 29 years. The CatBoost model predicted KOOS ADL scores with high accuracy when only 6 questions were asked ( Conclusion: ML algorithms successfully identified the essential questions in the KOOS ADL questionnaire. Only 35% (6/17) of KOOS ADL questions (descending stairs, ascending stairs, standing, walking on flat surface, putting on socks/stockings, and getting on/off toilet) are needed to predict KOOS ADL scores with high accuracy after ACL reconstruction. ML can be utilized successfully to streamline the burden of patient data collection. This, in turn, can potentially lead to improved patient reporting, increased compliance, and increased utilization of PROMs while still providing quality data.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingADLanterior cruciate ligamentfunction of daily livingKnee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreKOOSmachine learning algorithm; CatBoostpatient-reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID32270015
PMCPMC7093693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.