Clinical significance of myeloproliferative neoplasms with

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Optimized Test Utilization Significantly Increased the Positive Detection Rate for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Cancers · 2026
   Article
2. Dual-Driver Myeloproliferative Neoplasm: Concurrent p190Case reports in hematology · 2026
   Article
3. Superior detection of low-allele burden Janus kinase 2 V617F mutation and monitoring clonal evolution in myeloproliferative neoplasms using chip-based digital PCR.Annals of hematology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.