Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269928›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2020

Combination diagnosis with elastography strain ratio and molecular markers effectively improves the diagnosis rate of small breast cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Yi Hao, Guanghui Ren, Wei Yang, Wenyi Zheng, Yuming Wu, WenJing Li, Xin Li, Yingjia Li, Xia Guo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Early SUVQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Altered glycosylation in cancer: A promising target for biomarkers and therapeutics.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi HaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Guanghui RenDepartment of General Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Wei YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Wenyi ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Yuming WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
WenJing LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Xin LiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Viral Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Yingjia LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Xia GuoShenzhen Key Laboratory of Viral Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China.
Southern Medical University Shenzhen Hospital · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the strain ratio (SR) combined with molecular pathological and serum markers for the diagnosis of breast masses.

methodsSR and 7-point scale elasticity scores were used with real-time tissue elastography and 2-dimensional color-Doppler ultrasound (US) to diagnose breast lesions in 311 hospitalized patients. Immunohistochemical staining and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to examine pathological and serum tumor markers and their correlations with SR findings.

resultsSR had a higher diagnostic value compared to the 7-point scale elasticity score, displaying an obvious low-to-high distribution from benign to malignant lesions with an optimal cutoff point at 3.88, which yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.896 with 89.1% sensitivity, 85.6% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 91.0% and 82.8%, respectively. The differences of SR values between small (≤1.5 cm), large (>3 cm) (P=0.010), and moderate (>1.5 cm and ≤3 cm) sizes (P=0.038) in distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses were statistically significant, with SR being most specific and sensitive for diagnosing small lesions. Expression of 3 molecular pathological indicators (p75NTR, p63, and CK5/6), and 5 serum mastocarcinoma markers (uPA, PAI-I, CA27-29, CEA, and CA15-3) showed statistical significance (P<0.05) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. Furthermore, SR combined with CA15-3 and CK5/6 positivity showed 94.2% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity as combined markers for triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, whereas SR combined with D2-40 and CK19 were good diagnostic markers for breast cancer lymph node metastasis.

conclusionsSR, together with a molecular and serological marker, may serve as an additional tool for the diagnosis of small breast cancer tumors.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmsdiagnostic imagingelasticityelasticity imaging techniquesStrain ratio (SR)

Identifiers

PMID32269928
PMCPMC7136731
OpenAlexW3011610105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.