Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269876›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Driveline Sepsis Presenting As Gout.

Brittney Toms

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Gout].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022
    Article
  2. [Gout].Der Internist · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittney TomsNursing, Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, USA.
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with a history of gout, there could be a delay in diagnosis of a septic joint, which increases morbidity and mortality. The literature reports rare instances of coexistent gout and septic arthritis. We present a 64-year-old male with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, supported by a HeartWare ventricular assist device, who developed a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) driveline infection four months after device implant. He achieved suppression with minocycline 100 mg by mouth twice a day for five months before presenting to the emergency room with symptoms of gout. Joint aspirate was consistent with a diagnosis of MRSA as well as gout. The patient presented with typical symptoms of a percutaneous driveline infection: soreness at the exit site, erythema, and thick, purulent drainage. Wound culture of the driveline confirmed MRSA and guided antibiotic treatment. His presentation was unusual in that sepsis was identified only after he presented with septic arthritis, which led to the collection of blood cultures. He had no fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, or hypotension. This case illustrates that unresolving gout symptoms after one treatment, in a patient with a known driveline infection, should be further evaluated for possible sepsis and septic arthritis. The patient's unusual presentation of sepsis caused difficulties in diagnosis and management. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a driveline infection seeding a joint and causing septic arthritis.

Indexed as

arthritisgoutheart failureleft ventricular assist device (lvad)mechanical circulatory support (mcs)sepsisseptic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32269876
PMCPMC7137677
OpenAlexW3010495674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.