Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269847›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2020

Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Lihu Gu, Kang Zhang, Zefeng Shen, Xianfa Wang, Hepan Zhu, Junhai Pan, Xin Zhong, Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo, Ping Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Importance of duodenal stump reinforcement to prevent stump leakage after gastrectomy: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study (KSCC DELICATE study).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lihu GuDepartment of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-2939
Kang ZhangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8521-0247
Zefeng ShenDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-2275
Xianfa WangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-9291
Hepan ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2959-9382
Junhai PanDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4862-757X
Xin ZhongDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-819X
Parikshit Asutosh KhadarooDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Monash University School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-8551
Ping ChenDepartment of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-0331
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNMonash Health · AUNingbo University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuodenal stump leakage (DSL) is a potentially fatal complication that can occur after gastrectomy, but its underlying risk factors are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and management of DSL after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). MATERIALS AND

methodsRelevant data were collected from several prospective databases to retrospectively analyze the data of GC patients who underwent Billroth II (B-II) or Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction after laparoscopic gastrectomy from 2 institutions (Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences). The DSL risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis regression.

resultsA total of 810 patients were eligible for our analysis (426 with R-Y, 384 with B-II with Braun). Eleven patients had DSL (1.36%). Body mass index (BMI), elevated preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and unreinforced duodenal stump were the independent risk factors for DSL. DSL was diagnosed in 2-12 days, with a median of 8 days. Seven patients received conservative treatment, 3 patients received puncture treatment, and only 1 patient required reoperation. All patients recovered successfully after treatment.

conclusionsThe risk factors of DSL were BMI ≥24 kg/m

Indexed as

Duodenal stump leakageGastric cancerLaparoscopic gastrectomyRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32269847
PMCPMC7105415
OpenAlexW3006725081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.