Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269818›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses.

Alecia J Carter, Alice Baniel, Guy Cowlishaw, Elise Huchard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Primate carcass ecology in the Urema Rift, Mozambique.Primates; journal of primatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alecia J CarterISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-9312
Alice BanielDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7142-5864
Guy CowlishawThe Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-4625
Elise HuchardISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6944-449X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRStony Brook University · USZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What do animals know of death? What can animals' responses to death tell us about the evolution of species' minds, and the origins of humans' awareness of death and dying? A recent surge in interest in comparative thanatology may provide beginnings of answers to these questions. Here, we add to the comparative thanatology literature by reporting 12 cases of group members' responses to infants' deaths, including 1 miscarriage and 2 stillbirths, recorded over 13 years in wild Namibian chacma baboons. Wild baboons' responses to dead infants were similar to other primates: in general, the mother of the infant carried the infants' corpse for varying lengths of time (less than 1 h to 10 days) and tended to groom the corpses frequently, though, as in other studies, considerable individual differences were observed. However, we have not yet observed any corpse carriage of very long duration (i.e. greater than 20 days), which, though rare, occurs in other Old World monkeys and chimpanzees. We hypothesize this is due to the costs of carrying the corpse over the greater daily distances travelled by the Tsaobis baboons. Additionally, in contrast to other case reports, we observed male friends' 'protection' of the infant corpse on three occasions. We discuss the implications of these reports for current questions in the field.

Indexed as

awarenessbaboondeathmother–infantPapiothanatology

Identifiers

PMID32269818
PMCPMC7137963
OpenAlexW3010820962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.