ArticleRoyal Society open science2020
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (
Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphofunctional effects of captivity on the microanatomy of the talus bone in a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa).Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Age- and size-related changes in hind limb muscles in two baboon species (Papio anubis and P. papio).Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- How domestication, feralization and experience-dependent plasticity affect brain size variation inRoyal Society open science · 2024Article
- Maxillary morphology of chimpanzees: Captive versus wild environments.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Inner ear morphology in wild versus laboratory house mice.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Size and shape of the semicircular canal of the inner ear: A new marker of pig domestication?Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022Article
- Morphometric classification of kangaroo bones reveals paleoecological change in northwest Australia during the terminal Pleistocene.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effects of reduced mobility on trabecular bone density in captive big cats.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Constraints associated with captivity alter craniomandibular integration in wild boar.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
- Bones geometric morphometrics illustrate 10th millennium cal. BP domestication of autochthonous Cypriot wild boar (Sus scrofa circeus nov. ssp).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The domestication of South American camelids: a review.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021Article
- Management and domestication of cattle (Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021Article
- Cranial morphology of captive mammals: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in zoology · 2021Article
- Investigating the impact of captivity and domestication on limb bone cortical morphology: an experimental approach using a wild boar model.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Identifying early stages of reindeer domestication in the archaeological record: a 3D morphological investigation on forelimb bones of modern populations from Fennoscandia.Archaeological and anthropological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.