ArticleRoyal Society open science2020
Auditory cortical representation of music favours the perceived beat.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lateralised neural mechanisms facilitate auditory self-other distinction and coordination in human dyads.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Tempo-dependent selective enhancement of neural responses at the beat frequency can be mimicked by both an oscillator and an evoked model.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Revealing rhythm categorization in human brain activity.Science advances · 2025Article
- Measuring self-similarity in empirical signals to understand musical beat perception.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Rats synchronize predictively to metronomes.iScience · 2024Article
- A Second Introduction to the Neurobiology of Interval Timing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Probing Beat Perception with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) in Human Adults, Newborns, and Nonhuman Primates.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Omission responses in local field potentials in rat auditory cortex.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Spontaneous beat synchronization in rats: Neural dynamics and motor entrainment.Science advances · 2022Article
- Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- Auditory cortical representation of music favours the perceived beat.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has shown that musical beat perception is a surprisingly complex phenomenon involving widespread neural coordination across higher-order sensory, motor and cognitive areas. However, the question of how low-level auditory processing must necessarily shape these dynamics, and therefore perception, is not well understood. Here, we present evidence that the auditory cortical representation of music, even in the absence of motor or top-down activations, already favours the beat that will be perceived. Extracellular firing rates in the rat auditory cortex were recorded in response to 20 musical excerpts diverse in tempo and genre, for which musical beat perception had been characterized by the tapping behaviour of 40 human listeners. We found that firing rates in the rat auditory cortex were on average higher on the beat than off the beat. This 'neural emphasis' distinguished the beat that was perceived from other possible interpretations of the beat, was predictive of the degree of tapping consensus across human listeners, and was accounted for by a spectrotemporal receptive field model. These findings strongly suggest that the 'bottom-up' processing of music performed by the auditory system predisposes the timing and clarity of the perceived musical beat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.