ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Metacognition and Intersubjectivity: Reconsidering Their Relationship Following Advances From the Study of Persons With Psychosis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Metacognition and Self-Disturbances in Schizophrenia: Implications for Psychological and Neurocognitive Therapy.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- How Psychological Capital and Academic Burnout Shape Short-Video Addiction: A Latent Profile Analysis of Heterogeneity.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Promoting Reflection on the Process of Recovery: Unique Contributions from Literature and the Humanities for Practitioner.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Metacognition impairment in stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- I am a child, i learn through play; play-based character education.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Evolution of Linguistic Markers of Agency, Centrality and Content During Metacognitive Therapy for Psychosis: A Pilot Exploratory Study.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos' dilemma-on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) Delivered Virtually During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Illustration of Two Cases.Journal of contemporary psychotherapy · 2023Article
- Metacognition in schizophrenia: A practical overview of psychometric metacognition assessment tools for researchers and clinicians.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Conceptual disorganization as a mediating variable between visual learning and metacognition in schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Social Perception Deficit as a Factor of Vulnerability to Psychosis: A Brief Proposal for a Definition.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- The prefrontal cortex and (uniquely) human cooperation: a comparative perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Review
- Metacognition in psychosis: a renewed path to understanding of core disturbances and recovery-oriented treatment.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021Article
- Metacognition, social cognition, and mentalizing in psychosis: are these distinct constructs when it comes to subjective experience or are we just splitting hairs?BMC psychiatry · 2021Review
- Social Dysfunction in Psychosis Is More Than a Matter of Misperception: Advances From the Study of Metacognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As research on metacognition has progressed a significant array of definitions, methodologies and therapeutic applications have emerged. Some of this work has primarily framed metacognition as an activity carried out by one person in order to know, monitor, and adjust their beliefs, memories, and behaviors. Accordingly, problems with metacognition have often been characterized as issues related to cognition. This, however, risks neglecting how metacognition is also a fundamentally intersubjective act, one in which human beings know and reflect upon themselves and others primarily with and through connections with other people. In this paper, we review research on metacognition in schizophrenia using the integrative model of metacognition and a research paradigm in which metacognition is assessed within personal narratives. Stimulated by this work, we discuss how disturbances in intersubjective experience and metacognitive capacity mutually influence one another, with disruptions in metacognition perhaps more deeply understood as disruptions in relatedness with others. We then discuss how metacognition and intersubjectivity each affect mental health. We finally focus on the implications of this for treatments that target metacognition as well as future directions for research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.