Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

A Feasibility and Acceptability Trial of Social Cognitive Therapy in Early Psychosis Delivered Through a Virtual World: The VEEP Study.

Andrew Thompson, Farah Elahi, Alba Realpe, Max Birchwood, David Taylor, Ivo Vlaev, Fiona Leahy, Sandra Bucci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  10. Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew ThompsonOrygen, the Centre for Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Farah ElahiWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Alba RealpePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Max BirchwoodWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
David TaylorDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Ivo VlaevBehavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Fiona LeahyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Sandra BucciDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Warwick · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBOrygen Youth Health · AUUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing specific social cognitive difficulties is an important target in early psychosis and may help address poor functional outcomes. However, structured interventions using standard therapy settings including groups suffer from difficulties in recruitment and retention.

aimsTo address these issues, we aimed to modify an existing group social cognitive intervention entitled 'Social Cognition and Interaction Training' (SCIT) to be delivered through a virtual world environment (Second Life ©).

methodsA single arm nonrandomized proof-of-concept trial of SCIT-VR was conducted. Five groups of three to five individuals per group were recruited over 6 months. Eight sessions of SCIT-VR therapy were delivered through the virtual world platform Second Life© over a 5-week intervention window. Feasibility was examined using recruitment rates and retention. Acceptability was examined using qualitative methods. Secondary outcomes including social cognitive indices, functioning, and anxiety were measured pre- and postintervention.

resultsThe SCIT-VR therapy delivered was feasible (36% consent rate and 73.3% intervention completion rate), acceptable (high overall postsession satisfaction scores) and safe (no serious adverse events), and had high levels of participant satisfaction. Users found the environment immersive. Prepost changes were found in emotion recognition scores and levels of anxiety. There were no signs of clinical deterioration on any of the secondary measures.

conclusionThis proof-of-concept pilot trial suggested that delivering SCIT-VR through a virtual world is feasible and acceptable. There were some changes in prepost outcome measures that suggest the intervention has face validity. There is sufficient evidence to support a larger powered randomized controlled trial. CLINICAL

trial registrationISRCTN, identifier 41443166.

Indexed as

first episode psychosisproof-of-concept trialpsychosissocial cognition therapyvirtual environmentsvirtual world

Identifiers

PMID32269534
PMCPMC7109496
OpenAlexW3013345759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.