Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269501›Full record

ArticleRegional environmental change2017

Adaptation planning and the use of climate change projections in local government in England and Germany.

Susanne Lorenz, Suraje Dessai, Piers M Forster, Jouni Paavola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regional environmental change, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne LorenzSchool of Earth and Environment and ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9124-9690
Suraje DessaiSchool of Earth and Environment and ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Piers M ForsterSchool of Earth and Environment and ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Jouni PaavolaSchool of Earth and Environment and ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planning for adaptation to climate change is often regarded to be a local imperative and considered to be more effective if grounded on a solid evidence base and recognisant of relevant climate projections. Research has already documented some of the challenges of making climate information usable in decision-making but has not yet sufficiently reflected on the role of the wider institutional and regulatory context. This article examines the impact of the external institutional context on the use and usability of climate projections in local government through an analysis of 44 planning and climate change (adaptation) documents and 54 semi-structured interviews with planners in England and Germany conducted between July 2013 and May 2014. We show that there is little demand for climate projections in local adaptation planning in either country due to existing policy, legal and regulatory frameworks. Local government in England has not only experienced a decline in use of climate projections, but also the waning of the climate change adaptation agenda more widely, amidst changes in the planning and regulatory framework and severe budget cuts. In Germany, spatial planning makes substantial use of past and present climate data, but the strictly regulated nature of planning prevents the use of climate projections, due to their inherent uncertainties. Findings from the two countries highlight that if we are to better understand the usability of climate projections, we need to be more aware of the institutional context within which planning decisions are made. Otherwise we run the risk of continuing to provide tools and information that are of limited use within their intended context.

Indexed as

Climate change adaptationClimate change projectionsInstitutionsLocal governmentPlanningRegulation

Identifiers

PMID32269501
PMCPMC7114967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.