Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269476›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2020

Designing an Herbarium Digitisation Workflow with Built-In Image Quality Management.

Abraham Nieva de la Hidalga, Paul L Rosin, Xianfang Sun, Ann Bogaerts, Niko De Meeter, Sofie De Smedt, Maarten Strack van Schijndel, Paul Van Wambeke, Quentin Groom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abraham Nieva de la HidalgaSchool of Computer Science and Informatics - Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom School of Computer Science and Informatics - Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7348-7612
Paul L RosinSchool of Computer Science and Informatics - Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom School of Computer Science and Informatics - Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom.
Xianfang SunSchool of Computer Science and Informatics - Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom School of Computer Science and Informatics - Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom.
Ann BogaertsMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Niko De MeeterMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Sofie De SmedtMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Maarten Strack van SchijndelMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Paul Van WambekeMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Quentin GroomMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-5376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digitisation of natural history collections has evolved from creating databases for the recording of specimens' catalogue and label data to include digital images of specimens. This has been driven by several important factors, such as a need to increase global accessibility to specimens and to preserve the original specimens by limiting their manual handling. The size of the collections pointed to the need of high throughput digitisation workflows. However, digital imaging of large numbers of fragile specimens is an expensive and time-consuming process that should be performed only once. To achieve this, the digital images produced need to be useful for the largest set of applications possible and have a potentially unlimited shelf life. The constraints on digitisation speed need to be balanced against the applicability and longevity of the images, which, in turn, depend directly on the quality of those images. As a result, the quality criteria that specimen images need to fulfil influence the design, implementation and execution of digitisation workflows. Different standards and guidelines for producing quality research images from specimens have been proposed; however, their actual adaptation to suit the needs of different types of specimens requires further analysis. This paper presents the digitisation workflow implemented by Meise Botanic Garden (MBG). This workflow is relevant because of its modular design, its strong focus on image quality assessment, its flexibility that allows combining in-house and outsourced digitisation, processing, preservation and publishing facilities and its capacity to evolve for integrating alternative components from different sources. The design and operation of the digitisation workflow is provided to showcase how it was derived, with particular attention to the built-in audit trail within the workflow, which ensures the scalable production of high-quality specimen images and how this audit trail ensures that new modules do not affect either the speed of imaging or the quality of the images produced.

Indexed as

Data capturedigital specimendigitisation workflowherbarium sheetsimage quality controlnatural history collections

Identifiers

PMID32269476
PMCPMC7125238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.