Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269326›Full record

ReviewSpinal cord2020

Development of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Spinal Cord Injury (PedsQL™ SCI) module: qualitative methods.

Miriam Hwang, Kathy Zebracki, Lawrence C Vogel, Mary Jane Mulcahey, James W Varni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Reading level is just one component": best practices for cognitive debriefing patient-reported outcome instruments with pediatric populations.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PedsQL™ Spinal Cord Injury Module: Reliability and Validity.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miriam HwangShriners Hospitals for Children-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. mhwang@shrinenet.org.
Kathy ZebrackiShriners Hospitals for Children-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lawrence C VogelShriners Hospitals for Children-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mary Jane MulcaheyCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Physical Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0837-714X
James W VarniDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

Craig H. Neilsen Foundation 542021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designIt is a qualitative study.

objectivesTo develop the items and support content validity for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Spinal Cord Injury Module for youth and emerging adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).

settingCommunity and children's hospital.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted in pediatric and SCI-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) measures to create an item bank. A multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to discuss the conceptual framework of the module, reviewed the item bank, and generated a core set of items through a process of "binning-and-winnowing". International clinicians and researchers participated in iterative rounds of a Modified Delphi survey, until 90% agreement was reached on all items of the core set, resulting in the construction of a preliminary module. Cognitive interviews were conducted on individuals with SCI and their parents to determine the relevance of items and age-appropriate wording of the preliminary module. The research team regularly reviewed transcriptions of the interviews, and incorporated participant feedback to modify the modules. This process was repeated until content saturation was achieved.

resultsA total of 43 participants completed the cognitive interviews. Following five iterations of cognitive interviews and modifications based on participant input, the PedsQL™ SCI Module was generated. It comprised 67 items in the 12 domains of Daily Activities, Mobility, Bladder Function, Bowel Function, Muscle Spasms, Pressure Injury, Pain, Orthostatic Hypotension, Autonomic Dysreflexia, Participation, Worry, and Emotions.

conclusionsThe PedsQL™ SCI Module was developed using well-established qualitative methods. Internet-based field testing is underway to finalize its development and validation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDelphi TechniqueFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cord InjuriesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.