Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269290›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

An LCM-based genomic analysis of SPEM, Gastric Cancer and Pyloric Gland Adenoma in an Asian cohort.

Supriya Srivastava, Kie Kyon Huang, Khadija Rebbani, Kakoli Das, Zul Fazreen, Khay Guan Yeoh, Patrick Tan, Ming Teh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Surgical pathology clinics · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Supriya SrivastavaDepartment of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Kie Kyon HuangProgram in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Khadija RebbaniCancer Science Institute, National University Singapore, Singapore, 119756, Singapore.
Kakoli DasProgram in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0990-276X
Zul FazreenProgram in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Khay Guan YeohDepartment of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, 11928, Singapore.
Patrick TanProgram in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Ming TehDepartment of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. pattehm@nus.edu.sg.
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University Hospital · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM) and pyloric gland adenoma (PGA) in the stomach are metaplastic and neoplastic lesions, respectively, in which gastric body glands are replaced by pyloric glands. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genomic profile of SPEM and compare it with intestinal-type gastric cancer (GC) and PGA. Thirteen gastrectomies showing PGA with or without dysplasia, GC and SPEM were retrospectively selected. MUC5AC, MUC6, gastrin, and TFF2 IHC were performed. Lesions were subjected to laser capture microdissection followed by DNA extraction. Forty-three DNA samples were extracted from PGA without cytological dysplasia, PGA with low-grade and high-grade dysplasia and pyloric gland adenocarcinoma, GC, SPEM, and adjacent normal tissue from the body of the stomach and were subjected to exome sequencing for 49 genes that are commonly dysregulated in GC. Sanger sequencing was performed for confirmation. Twenty nonsynonymous mutations were identified in SPEM, and none of these were frameshifts or indels. PGA with or without cytological dysplasia showed a significantly higher number of mutations compared with SPEM. As cytological dysplasia increased from no dysplasia to dysplasia in PGA, the percentage of frameshift mutations, indels, and missense variations increased. Further missense or frameshift mutations were observed in the KRAS, APC, TP53, and CTNNB1 genes in the PGA group. In GC, mutations were observed in the TP53 gene (p.Arg248Gln). Missense mutations in the MUC5AC, KRAS, BRAF, and EZH2 genes were common between SPEM and GC. SPEM showed fewer genomic variations than GC and PGA, and was genomically distinct from the pyloric epithelium in PGA. Stepwise progression of PGA from PGA without dysplasia to PGA with dysplasia/adenocarcinoma was associated an increase in mutations. SPEM appears to be more genomically similar to GC than PGA.

Indexed as

AdenomaGastric MucosaHumansLaser Capture MicrodissectionMetaplasiaMutationPrecancerous ConditionsRetrospective StudiesSingaporeStomachStomach DiseasesStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32269290
OpenAlexW3015818228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.