Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269271›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of IgA nephropathy: A network meta-analysis.

Jiaxing Tan, Lingqiu Dong, Donghui Ye, Yi Tang, Tengyue Hu, Zhengxia Zhong, Padamata Tarun, Yicong Xu, Wei Qin

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxing TanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lingqiu DongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Donghui YeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yi TangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tengyue HuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhengxia ZhongWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Padamata TarunWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yicong XuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wei QinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. qinweihx@scu.edu.cn.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a common autoimmune glomerulonephritis that can result in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Whether immunosuppressants are superior or equivalent to supportive care is still controversial. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment for IgAN. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched on December 30, 2018. We used a random-effects model with a Bayesian approach to appraise both renal outcomes and serious adverse effects. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to present the relative effects. The ranking probabilities were calculated by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). In total, 24 RCTs comprising 6 interventions were analyzed. Steroids significantly delayed the progression of renal deterioration with acceptable serious adverse effects, compared with supportive care (RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.13-0.51, SUCRA = 48.7%). AZA combined with steroids might be an alternative immunosuppressive therapy. Tacrolimus might decrease the proteinuria level (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.2-9.4, SUCRA = 66.5%) but cannot improve renal function, and the side effects of tacrolimus should not be neglected. MMF and CYC showed no superiority in the treatment of IgAN. In summary, steroids might be recommended as the first-line immunosuppressive therapy for IgAN.

Indexed as

AdultAzathioprineClinical Trials as TopicDrug CombinationsFemaleGlomerulonephritis, IGAGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidTacrolimusTreatment OutcomeAzathioprineDrug CombinationsGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID32269271
PMCPMC7142138
OpenAlexW3010352611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.