Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269131›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2020

Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification.

Jason Stopyra, Anna Catherine Snavely, Brian Hiestand, Brian J Wells, Kristin Macfarlane Lenoir, David Herrington, Nella Hendley, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Chadwick D Miller, Simon A Mahler

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02056964 completednot on this map

The HEART Pathway: Bridging the Gap Between Operations, Research, and Education

TypeobservationalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2013 to 2019Enrolled14,717ConditionsChest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Chest Pain Atypical Syndrome, Chest Pain Rule Out Myocardial Infarction
NCT04617834 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Rural Health Via Cardiovascular Telehealth for Rural Patients (E-VICTORS) Project

TypeobservationalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2021 to 2026Enrolled215ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Acute Coronary SyndromeArmsQuality Surveillance Data Collection
NCT05532787 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Acute Chest Pain (EDACS & HEART Pathway) in Emergency Departments of the United Arab Emirates: A Multi-Center Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorZayed Military HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,200ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Chest PainArmsApplication of acute chest pain risk stratification scores (HEART and EDACS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. A Closer Look at the HEART Score.Cardiology research · 2022
    Review
  10. Contemporary Biomarker Strategies for Patients with Chest Pain.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jason StopyraEmergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA jstopyra@wakehealth.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7457-3969
Anna Catherine SnavelyPublic Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Brian HiestandEmergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Brian J WellsTranslational Science Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Kristin Macfarlane LenoirPublic Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
David HerringtonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Nella HendleyEmergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Nicklaus P AshburnEmergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Chadwick D MillerEmergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Simon A MahlerEmergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

CMR-IMPACTR01HL118263 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, CHADWICK DAVID · 2013 to 2018
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL120008NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe History Electrocardiogram Age Risk factor Troponin (HEART) Pathway and Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score (EDACS) are validated accelerated diagnostic pathways designed to risk stratify patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Data from large multisite prospective studies comparing these accelerated diagnostic pathways are limited.

methodsThe HEART Pathway Implementation is a prospective three-site cohort study, which accrued adults with symptoms concerning for acute coronary syndrome. Physicians completed electronic health record HEART Pathway and EDACS risk assessments on participants. Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation) at 30 days were determined using electronic health record, insurance claims and death index data. Test characteristics for detection of major adverse cardiac events were calculated for both accelerated diagnostic pathways and McNemar's tests were used for comparisons.

results5799 patients presenting to the emergency department were accrued, of which HEART Pathway and EDACS assessments were completed on 4399. Major adverse cardiac events at 30 days occurred in 449/4399 (10.2%). The HEART Pathway identified 38.4% (95% CI 37.0% to 39.9%) of patients as low-risk compared with 58.1% (95% CI 56.6% to 59.6%) identified as low-risk by EDACS (p<0.001). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.9%) of patients classified as low-risk by the HEART Pathway compared with 1.0% (95% CI 0.7% to 1.5%) of patients identified as low-risk by EDACS (p<0.001). Thus, the HEART Pathway had a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI 99.1% to 99.8%) for major adverse cardiac events compared with a negative predictive value of 99.0% (95% CI 98.5% to 99.3%) for EDACS.

conclusionsEDACS identifies a larger proportion of patients as low-risk than the HEART Pathway, but has a higher missed major adverse cardiac events rate at 30 days. Physicians will need to consider their risk tolerance when deciding whether to adopt the HEART Pathway or EDACS accelerated diagnostic pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02056964.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesElectrocardiographyAcute Coronary SyndromeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngina PectorisBiomarkersClinical Decision-MakingComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansBiomarkersTroponinacute coronary syndromeshealthcare delivery

Identifiers

PMID32269131
PMCPMC7962144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.