ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2020
Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The HEART Pathway: Bridging the Gap Between Operations, Research, and Education
Enhancing Rural Health Via Cardiovascular Telehealth for Rural Patients (E-VICTORS) Project
Comparison of Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Acute Chest Pain (EDACS & HEART Pathway) in Emergency Departments of the United Arab Emirates: A Multi-Center Prospective Study
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A meta-analysis on the safety and accuracy of the HEART pathway for risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- 2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Evaluation and Disposition of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Guideline
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Cost Savings from Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient Evaluation: A Monte Carlo Simulation.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Sex differences in acute chest pain care in a multisite U.S. emergency department cohort.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Review
- Performance of the High-STEACS Early Rule Out Pathway Using hs-cTnT at 30 Days in a Multisite US Cohort.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Observational
- Modification of HEART Pathway for Patients With Chest Pain: A Korean Perspective.Korean circulation journal · 2023Article
- A Closer Look at the HEART Score.Cardiology research · 2022Review
- Contemporary Biomarker Strategies for Patients with Chest Pain.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- A New Risk Score for Patients With Acute Chest Pain and Normal High Sensitivity Troponin.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Comparative prospective study of the performance of chest pain scores and clinical assessment in an emergency department cohort in Singapore.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
- Prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events with two risk scales for acute chest pain in the emergency department.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe History Electrocardiogram Age Risk factor Troponin (HEART) Pathway and Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score (EDACS) are validated accelerated diagnostic pathways designed to risk stratify patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Data from large multisite prospective studies comparing these accelerated diagnostic pathways are limited.
methodsThe HEART Pathway Implementation is a prospective three-site cohort study, which accrued adults with symptoms concerning for acute coronary syndrome. Physicians completed electronic health record HEART Pathway and EDACS risk assessments on participants. Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation) at 30 days were determined using electronic health record, insurance claims and death index data. Test characteristics for detection of major adverse cardiac events were calculated for both accelerated diagnostic pathways and McNemar's tests were used for comparisons.
results5799 patients presenting to the emergency department were accrued, of which HEART Pathway and EDACS assessments were completed on 4399. Major adverse cardiac events at 30 days occurred in 449/4399 (10.2%). The HEART Pathway identified 38.4% (95% CI 37.0% to 39.9%) of patients as low-risk compared with 58.1% (95% CI 56.6% to 59.6%) identified as low-risk by EDACS (p<0.001). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.9%) of patients classified as low-risk by the HEART Pathway compared with 1.0% (95% CI 0.7% to 1.5%) of patients identified as low-risk by EDACS (p<0.001). Thus, the HEART Pathway had a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI 99.1% to 99.8%) for major adverse cardiac events compared with a negative predictive value of 99.0% (95% CI 98.5% to 99.3%) for EDACS.
conclusionsEDACS identifies a larger proportion of patients as low-risk than the HEART Pathway, but has a higher missed major adverse cardiac events rate at 30 days. Physicians will need to consider their risk tolerance when deciding whether to adopt the HEART Pathway or EDACS accelerated diagnostic pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02056964.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.