ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2020
Deoxyribozyme-based method for absolute quantification of
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- DENA: training an authentic neural network model using Nanopore sequencing data of Arabidopsis transcripts for detection and quantification of NGenome biology · 2022Article
- RNA-Cleaving Deoxyribozymes Differentiate Methylated Cytidine Isomers in RNA.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021Article
- LEAD-mAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021Article
- New Twists in Detecting mRNA Modification Dynamics.Trends in biotechnology · 2021Review
- NAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.