Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32269057›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2020

Beyond cycle lanes and large-scale infrastructure: a scoping review of initiatives that groups and organisations can implement to promote cycling for the Cycle Nation Project.

Paul Kelly, Chloë Williamson, Graham Baker, Adrian Davis, Sarah Broadfield, Allison Coles, Hayley Connell, Greig Logan, Jill P Pell, Cindy M Gray and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07005674 (Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Community-based Nine-week Multi-component Group-based Cycling Intervention Versus a Single Cycle Training Session to Increase Cycling Participation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07005674 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Community-based Nine-week Multi-component Group-based Cycling Intervention Versus a Single Cycle Training Session to Increase Cycling Participation: the Cycle Nation Communities Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GlasgowRan2025 to 2027Enrolled268ConditionsHealthyArmsCycle Nation, Cycling Scotland standard cycling session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. National Trends in Cycling in Light of the Norwegian Bike Traffic Index.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul KellyPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK p.kelly@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1946-9848
Chloë WilliamsonPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Graham BakerPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Adrian DavisPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah BroadfieldBritish Cycling, Manchester, UK.
Allison ColesBritish Cycling, Manchester, UK.
Hayley ConnellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Greig LoganInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jill P PellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Cindy M GrayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jason Mr GillInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Cycle Nation Project
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBBritish Cycling · GBEdinburgh Napier University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCycling has well-established positive relationships with health. Evidence suggests that large-scale infrastructure and built-environment initiatives to promote cycling are likely to be necessary but not sufficient to maximise cycling participation. Smaller-scale initiatives that can be implemented by organisations (eg, employers) and groups (eg, community groups) are therefore also important, but the full range of feasible activities to promote cycling is not known. We aimed to scope the literature and map organisational, social and individual level activities to increase cycling.

methodsDesign: Scoping review following an established five-stage process.Eligibility criteria: Studies or publicly available reports describing cycling promotion initiatives deemed feasible for organisations or groups to implement.Sources of evidence and selection: (i) online databases (Ovid (Medline), Ovid (Embase), SportDISCUS (Ebscohost), ProQuest, Web of Science), (ii) existing systematic reviews, (iii) expert stakeholder consultation.

resultsWe extracted data from 129 studies and reports, from 20 different countries, identifying 145 cycling promotion initiatives. From these initiatives we identified 484 actions within 93 action types within 33 action categories under the nine intervention functions described by Michie

conclusionThis is the first comprehensive map to summarise the broad range of action types feasible for implementation within organisation/group-based cycling promotion initiatives. The map will be a critical tool for communities, employers, practitioners and researchers in designing interventions to increase cycling.

Indexed as

BicyclingCoercionEnvironment DesignHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHumansMotivationPersuasive CommunicationSocial Environmentbehaviourcyclinghealth promotionphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32269057
PMCPMC7677468
OpenAlexW3004260068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.