Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32268920›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2020

Perspectives about the baby friendly hospital/health initiative in Australia: an online survey.

Anahita Esbati, Jane Taylor, Amanda Henderson, Margaret Barnes, Lauren Kearney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anahita EsbatiSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia. anahita_beta@yahoo.com.
Jane TaylorSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia.
Amanda HendersonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia.
Margaret BarnesSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia.
Lauren KearneySchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia.
University of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence supports the health and economic benefits of breastfeeding, and the positive impact of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI) on increasing breastfeeding rates and improving breastfeeding outcomes. The BFHI is a World Health Organization and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund initiative to promote, support and maintain breastfeeding. The BFHI was updated in 2018 and includes the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (the Ten Steps 2018) and the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (the WHO Code). Despite policy and guideline support for breastfeeding and the BFHI, there are currently only 70 accredited hospitals, healthcare centres and regional clusters in Australia, accounting for 23% of maternity facilities. This research aimed to explore health professionals and other stakeholders' perspectives on the uptake and implementation of the BFHI in Australia from an organisational change perspective.

methodsAn online survey administered via relevant Australian-based professional associations was fully or partially completed by 332 participants who support mothers and newborns in their roles. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse quantitative and qualitative data.

resultsThe majority of participants supported legislating the WHO Code, closely monitoring BFHI compliance, ensuring sufficient knowledge about breastfeeding and the BFHI among staff, improving care within maternity facilities, continuous support of mothers' post-discharge, and improving social media support of breastfeeding. It was also perceived that an interdisciplinary team approach and multidisciplinary involvement were important requirements for successfully implementing the BFHI. There was no consensus among participants that Australian health policies support breastfeeding and the implementation of the BFHI.

conclusionsThis study emphasised the significance of legislation around the Code, executive and leadership support and culture, and providing adequate resources concerning uptake and implementation of the BFHI. Considering that uptake of the BFHI has been limited and no formal government support has been provided to further develop the BFHI and support the Code in Australia, findings of this research may help with potential future actions to facilitate the BFHI uptake and Code implementation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBreast FeedingHospitalsStakeholder ParticipationAdultAustraliaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBFHIBreastfeedingCode of Marketing of Breast-milk SubstitutesImplementationMaternity facilitiesTen steps to successful breastfeedingUptake

Identifiers

PMID32268920
PMCPMC7140552
OpenAlexW3015981292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.