ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020
The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05844098 (Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed surgery for high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations does not compromise clinical and radiographic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of radiological and patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic dual-reduction fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation: transosseous and half-cerclage fixation outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Study of 2 Different Arthroscopic Coracoid Tunnel-free Coracoclavicular Sling Fixation Techniques for the Treatment of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Dislocation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of the efficacy of modified double-bundle suspension fixation versus single-bundle suspension fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation treatment.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting reduction loss risk after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the endobutton device.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Combined coracoclavicular ligament and transacromial capsule reconstruction for chronic acromioclavicular joint instability: clinical and radiological outcomes.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Article
- Surgical vs conservative: what is the best treatment of acute Rockwood III acromioclavicular joint dislocation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Outcomes of arthroscopic coracoclavicular management for acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Progressive Loss of Acromioclavicular Joint Reduction Correlated with Progressive Clavicular Tunnel Widening after Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Effect of Clavicular Tunnel Position on Reduction Loss in Patients with Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations Operated with a Single-Bundle Suspensory Loop Device.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic acromioclavicular stabilization for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Article
- Mid-term clinical and sonographic outcomes of minimally invasive acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: mini-open versus arthroscopically assisted.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Assessment of Coracoclavicular Ligament Healing on MRI After Arthroscopic TightRope Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Review
- Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2022Review
- Clinical and radiological outcome of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective cohort study on Hook plate versus arthroscopic assisted single coracoclavicular tunnel with DogBone™ button dual FiberTape® construct.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Hook Plate versus TightRope System in the Treatment of Acute Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocation.Advances in orthopedics · 2022Article
- Comparison of the TightRope system versus hook plate in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of reduction loss of more than 3 mm on clinical and radiological results after at least 2 years of follow-up after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations using a double-button device.
methodsThirty-six patients who had acute (< 3 weeks old), type III or V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations underwent arthroscopic fixation of the AC joint using a double-button device. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed at preoperative, postoperative first day, 3 months and last follow-up. When the coracoclavicular (CC) distances of patients at the last follow-up were compared to the early postop CC distances, those with a difference of 3 mm or less were grouped as group A and those with a difference of more than 3 mm were grouped as group B.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, follow-up time, time from injury to surgery, return to work, and distribution of Rockwood classification. Pre-operative CC distance was reduced from 18.7 ± 3.5 to 8.5 ± 0.6 in the early postoperative period. Anatomic reduction was achieved in all patients compared with the unaffected side (CC distance 8.6 ± 0.7). However, the CC distance increased to 9.9 ± 1.5 at the third-month follow-up and increased to 11 ± 2.7 at the last follow-up. There were no significant Constant score differences between the groups in the preoperative and last follow-up periods (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the mean Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) score of group A was 84.4 ± 8, whereas it was 68.3 ± 8.3 for group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the subjective evaluation and aesthetic subjective satisfaction values of group B were lower than group A (p < 0.01).
conclusionsReduction loss of more than 3 mm was observed in 25% of patients after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device. Although this loss did not create a statistically significant difference in Constant scores, AC joint-specific tests such as ACJI, subjective evaluation, and aesthetic subjective satisfaction values were significantly impaired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.