Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32268907›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Evaluation of personal protection afforded by repellent-treated sandals against mosquito bites in south-eastern Tanzania.

Onyango P Sangoro, Tegemeo Gavana, Marceline Finda, Winfrida Mponzi, Emmanuel Hape, Alex Limwagu, Nicodem J Govella, Prosper Chaki, Fredros O Okumu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review of the ecology and behaviour ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Onyango P SangoroEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania. psangoro@icipe.org.
Tegemeo GavanaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Marceline FindaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Winfrida MponziEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Emmanuel HapeEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Alex LimwaguEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Nicodem J GovellaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Prosper ChakiEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Fredros O OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology · TZ

Funding

Grand Challenges Canada S5-0442-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutdoor and early evening mosquito biting needs to be addressed if malaria elimination is to be achieved. While indoor-targeted interventions, such as insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying, remain essential, complementary approaches that tackle persisting outdoor transmission are urgently required to maximize the impact. Major malaria vectors principally bite human hosts around the feet and ankles. Consequently, this study investigated whether sandals treated with efficacious spatial repellents can protect against outdoor biting mosquitoes. METHODOLOGY: Sandals affixed with hessian bands measuring 48 cm

resultsIn semi-field tests, sandals fitted with hessian bands measuring 48 cm

conclusionTransfluthrin-treated sandals conferred significant protection against mosquito bites in semi-field and field settings. Further evaluation is recommended for this tool as a potential complementary intervention against malaria. This intervention could be particularly useful for protecting against outdoor exposure to mosquito bites. Additional studies are necessary to optimize treatment techniques and substrates, establish safety profiles and determine epidemiological impact in different settings.

Indexed as

AnophelesCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsect RepellentsMosquito ControlShoesAdultAnimalsHumansInsect Bites and StingsMaleTanzaniaYoung AdultCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsect RepellentstransfluthrinIfakaraNew toolsResidual malaria transmissionTransfluthrinTransfluthrin-treated footwearVector borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID32268907
PMCPMC7140554
OpenAlexW3016145776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.