Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32268812›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation2020

Today's Students, Tomorrow's Physicians: Opinions on Enacted and Prospective Health Care Policies.

Jordan M Rook, Jacob A Fox, Alec M Feuerbach, James R Blum, Bruce L Henschen, Antoinette R Oot, Jacob B Pierce, Cynthia S Davey, Tyler N A Winkelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordan M RookDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-4704
Jacob A FoxUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Alec M FeuerbachIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
James R BlumIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Bruce L HenschenDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Antoinette R OotDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jacob B PierceDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-1673
Cynthia S DaveyClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Tyler N A WinkelmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-5223

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Future physicians will be key stakeholders in the formation, implementation, and success of health care policies enacted during their careers, though little is known of their opinions of enacted and proposed policies since the 2016 U.S. presidential election. This study aimed to understand the opinions of medical students related to policies including, but not limited to, protections for people with pre-existing conditions, a public option on the private exchange, and single-payer health care. Online surveys were completed by 1,660 medical students at 7 U.S. medical schools between October 2017 and November 2017. The authors used multiple logistic regression to examine associations between student characteristics and support of policies. In total, 1,660 of 4,503 (36.9%) eligible medical students completed the survey. A majority of respondents identified 4 extant Affordable Care Act policies as important, including its protections for patients with pre-existing conditions (95.3%) and Medicaid expansion (77.8%). With respect to prospective reforms, 82.6% supported a public insurance option, and 70.5% supported a single-payer health care system. Only 2.2% supported reducing funding for Medicaid. Although views varied by sex, anticipated specialty, and political affiliation, medical students largely supported prospective policies that would expand insurance coverage and access to health care.

Indexed as

Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActPhysiciansDelivery of Health CareHealth PolicyHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMedicaidProspective StudiesStudentsUnited StatesAffordable Care Acthealth care reformhealth policymedical studentopinionsingle-payersurvey

Identifiers

PMID32268812
PMCPMC7748919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.