ArticleMicroorganisms2020
Autophagic Proteome in Two
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Wine Yeast Autolysis: Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms, and the Release of Organic Compounds in White and Sparkling Wines-An Updated Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Intracellular Aminopeptidase Activity Determination from the Fungus Sporisorium reilianum: Purification and Biochemical Characterization of psrAPEi Enzyme.Current microbiology · 2022Article
- Editorial for Special Issue "Yeast in Winemaking".Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Comparative Study of the Proteins Involved in the Fermentation-Derived Compounds in Two Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A correlation between autophagy and autolysis has been proposed in order to acceleratethe acquisition of wine organoleptic properties during sparkling wine elaboration. In this context, aproteomic analysis was carried out in two industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (P29,conventional sparkling wine strain and G1, implicated in sherry wine elaboration) with the aim ofstudying the autophagy-related proteome and comparing the effect of CO2 overpressure duringsparkling wine elaboration. In general, a detrimental effect of pressure and second fermentationdevelopment on autophagy-related proteome was observed in both strains, although it was morepronounced in flor yeast strain G1. Proteins mainly involved in autophagy regulation andautophagosome formation in flor yeast G1, and those required for vesicle nucleation and expansionin P29 strain, highlighted in sealed bottle. Proteins Sec2 and Sec18 were detected 3-fold underpressure conditions in P29 and G1 strains, respectively. Moreover, 'fingerprinting' obtained frommultivariate data analysis established differences in autophagy-related proteome between strainsand conditions. Further research is needed to achieve more solid conclusions and design strategiesto promote autophagy for an accelerated autolysis, thus reducing cost and time production, as wellas acquisition of good organoleptic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.