ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2020
Validation of an E-cigarette Purchase Task in Advanced Generation Device Users.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06506162 (The Effect of Flavor and Nicotine Strength on the Abuse Liability and Appeal of Oral Nicotine Products), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Flavor and Nicotine Strength on the Abuse Liability and Appeal of Oral Nicotine Products
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary validation of an experimental cannabis marketplace and its psychometric properties against an established measure of cannabis demand.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2026Article
- Electronic cigarette cue reactivity in exclusive electronic cigarette users.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- Moral injury among women military veterans and demand for cigarettes: A behavioral economic investigation using a hypothetical purchase task.Preventive medicine · 2024Article
- The Scientific Basis for the Regulation of Flavors in Tobacco Products.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2024Review
- The electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) purchase task: Are results sensitive to price framing?Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- The Cigarillo Purchase Task: A Qualitative Analysis.Health behavior research · 2023Article
- Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on delay discounting among young, experienced, exclusive ENDS users: An initial study.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- Behavioral economic relationship between cannabis and cigarettes: Evidence from hypothetical purchase tasks.The International journal on drug policy · 2023Article
- Validity of a little cigars/cigarillos purchase task in dual users of cigars and cigarettes.Addictive behaviors · 2022Article
- E-Cigarette Demand: Impact of Commodity Definitions and Test-Retest Reliability.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021Article
- Exclusive E-Cigarette Users Report Lower Levels of Respiratory Symptoms Relative to Dual E-Cigarette and Cigarette Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020Article
- Behavioral economic demand assessments in the addictions.Current opinion in psychology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBehavioral economic purchase tasks are used to estimate the reinforcing value of drugs by asking participants how much they would purchase across a range of increasing prices. We sought to validate such a task for e-cigarettes in experienced users of advanced generation, tank-style devices.
methodsDual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes (N = 54) and exclusive e-cigarette users (N = 59) attended one session during which they completed assessments including two versions of the E-cigarette Purchase Task: one that asked how many puffs of their e-cigarette they would purchase in 24 hours at varying prices and one that asked how many mLs of e-liquid they would purchase. We correlated purchase task outcomes with other measures of e-cigarette use. We also compared the tasks across dual and exclusive users.
resultsIndices derived from the mLs-based task were more likely to be correlated with self-reported use rates, e-cigarette dependence, and cotinine levels than the puffs-based task. Exclusive users showed greater demand on than dual users only on the mLs version when using an F-test comparison method, while multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) results showed that dual users showed greater demand only on the puffs task.
conclusionsResults indicate that the mLs version had greater validity than the puffs version in terms of clinical indices. Dual users may still be on a trajectory to fully switching to e-cigarettes; thus, puffs as a measure may be more intuitive, as this measure is shared by cigarettes and e-cigarettes. For exclusive users, the unit they purchase their e-liquid in may be the most relevant unit and better capture their demand for that product. IMPLICATIONS: Behavioral economic purchase tasks have been widely used to understand nicotine use. We have developed two versions of a purchase task for e-cigarette use and compared the two versions in users of advanced generation e-cigarette devices. We found that the mLs version of the task better-reflected use patterns relative to a puffs version, which suggests that participants struggle to place monetary value on a unit of consumption (ie, puffs). Validated measures of e-cigarette reinforcement will be important as researchers and regulators determine which features of these products contribute to reinforcing efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.