ArticleJAMA network open2020
Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADHD in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Incidence, Prevalence, and Treatment. An Analysis of Routine Health Insurance Data.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Data Sets in Cardiac Surgery.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Variable Association of Neighborhood Deprivation and Race With Postoperative Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- National mortality trends in mood affective disorders and hypertensive/ischemic heart diseases in the United States, 1999 to 2020: a CDC WONDER analysis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Determinants of loss to follow-up after eye-related emergency visits: A race-stratified analysis at a level I trauma center.PloS one · 2026Article
- Concurrent aortic stenosis and hypertension: mortality trends in US older adults from 1999-2020.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Detection of emergency department patients at risk of dementia through artificial intelligence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Observational
- Clinical diagnosis groups developed to bridge the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding transition and monitor trends in workers' compensation claims - Ohio, 2011-2018.Journal of safety research · 2025Article
- Understanding disparities in cardiovascular death rates among older adults with sick sinus syndrome in the US.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Creating Risk-Adjusted Payment Formulas.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Ambient heat and diabetes hospitalizations: Does the timing of heat exposure matter?The Science of the total environment · 2024Article
- Using a severity threshold to improve occupational injury surveillance: Assessment of a severe traumatic injury-based occupational health indicator across the International Classification of Diseases lexicon transition.American journal of industrial medicine · 2024Article
- Paying for Medical and Social Complexity in Massachusetts Medicaid.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Risk of antidepressant initiation among users of cardiovascular agents and metformin. Findings from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) and Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), Norway: Findings from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) and Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), Norway.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2023Article
- Trends in psychiatric diagnoses by COVID-19 infection and hospitalization among patients with and without recent clinical psychiatric diagnoses in New York city from March 2020 to August 2021.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Development and Assessment of a New Framework for Disease Surveillance, Prediction, and Risk Adjustment: The Diagnostic Items Classification System.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Willingness to Pay for Down Syndrome Screening: A systematics Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Review
- Prevalence trends of depression and anxiety symptoms in adults with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes 1995-2019: The HUNT studies, Norway.BMC psychology · 2021Article
- Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Prescribing Patterns of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Taiwan.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Racial and ethnic patterns and differences in health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries with and without cognitive deficits or Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: On October 1, 2015, the US transitioned to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) for recording diagnoses, symptoms, and procedures. It is unknown whether this transition was associated with changes in diagnostic category prevalence based on diagnosis classification systems commonly used for payment and quality reporting. Objective: To assess changes in diagnostic category prevalence associated with the ICD-10-CM transition. Design, Setting, and Participants: This interrupted time series analysis and cross-sectional study examined level and trend changes in diagnostic category prevalence associated with the ICD-10-CM transition and clinically reviewed a subset of diagnostic categories with changes of 20% or more. Data included insurance claim diagnoses from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, for more than 18 million people aged 0 to 64 years with private insurance. Diagnoses were mapped using 3 common diagnostic classification systems: World Health Organization (WHO) disease chapters, Department of Health and Human Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (HHS-HCCs), and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification System (AHRQ-CCS). Data were analyzed from December 1, 2018, to January 21, 2020. Exposures: US implementation of ICD-10-CM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of individuals with at least 1 diagnosis in a diagnostic classification category per 10 000 eligible members. Results: The analytic sample contained information on 2.1 billion enrollee person-months with 3.4 billion clinically assigned diagnoses; the mean (range) monthly sample size was 22.1 (18.4 to 27.1 ) million individuals. While diagnostic category prevalence changed minimally for WHO disease chapters, the ICD-10-CM transition was associated with level changes of 20% or more among 20 of 127 HHS-HCCs (15.7%) and 46 of 282 AHRQ-CCS categories (16.3%) and with trend changes of 20% or more among 12 of 127 of HHS-HCCs (9.4%) and 27 of 282 of AHRQ-CCS categories (9.6%). For HHS-HCCs, monthly rates of individuals with any acute myocardial infarction diagnosis increased 131.5% (95% CI, 124.1% to 138.8%), primarily because HHS added non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses to this category. The HHS-HCC for diabetes with chronic complications increased by 92.4% (95% CI, 84.2% to 100.5%), primarily from including new diabetes-related hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia codes, and the rate for completed pregnancy with complications decreased by 54.5% (95% CI, -58.7% to -50.2%) partly due to removing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery as a complication. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the ICD-10-CM transition was associated with large prevalence changes for many diagnostic categories. Diagnostic classification systems developed using ICD-9-CM may need to be refined using ICD-10-CM data to avoid unintended consequences for disease surveillance, performance assessment, and risk-adjusted payments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.