Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32267479›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2020

Risk Factors for Keratinocyte Carcinoma in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants.

Jeffrey F Scott, Kevin R Brough, Konstantin V Grigoryan, John G Muzic, Grace Y Kim, Rosalynn R Z Conic, Sheena T Hill, Jerry D Brewer, Christian L Baum, Mark R Litzow and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey F ScottDepartment of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kevin R BroughDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Konstantin V GrigoryanDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John G MuzicDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Grace Y KimDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rosalynn R Z ConicDepartment of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sheena T HillDepartment of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jerry D BrewerDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Christian L BaumDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark R LitzowDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
William J HoganDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mrinal S PatnaikDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shahrukh K HashmiDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hillard M LazarusDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jeremy S BordeauxDepartment of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cheryl L ThompsonDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Meg R GerstenblithDepartment of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Julia S LehmanDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity School · USCase Western Reserve University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) is known to increase the risk for keratinocyte carcinoma. The extent to which host characteristics, including pigmentary phenotype and UV radiation exposure, contribute is unknown. Objective: To identify and validate independent risk factors for keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT, including those associated with the transplant and the host. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a consecutive sample of alloHCT recipients from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (n = 872) and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (n = 147). Participants from the Mayo Clinic were randomly allocated (2:1) into discovery (n = 581) and validation (n = 291) cohorts. Time to first keratinocyte carcinoma and information about transplant- and host-associated risk factors were extracted. A multivariate keratinocyte carcinoma risk model was created using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model with P ≤ .05 for entry that incorporated all covariates that were individually statistically significant at α = 0.05 in the discovery cohort. The risk model was first internally validated using the Mayo Clinic validation cohort and then externally validated using the independent cohort of alloHCT recipients at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Data were analyzed from March 13, 2018, to June 12, 2019. Exposures: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to development of the first cutaneous keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT; secondary outcome, time to development of the first individual basal and/or squamous cell carcinoma after alloHCT. Results: Of the 872 alloHCT recipients identified in the Mayo Clinic cohort (520 men [59.6%]; mean [SD] age, 48.3 [12.6] years), 95 (10.9%) developed keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT during 5349 person-years of follow-up. Of the 147 alloHCT recipients in the exernal validation cohort (86 men [58.5%]; mean [SD] age, 47.9 [17.5] years), 18 (12.2%) developed keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT in 880 person-years of follow up. Risk factors independently associated with keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT included age (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 years, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.42), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.20-5.09), clinically photodamaged skin (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.87-6.41), and history of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.41-5.91). Harrell concordance statistics were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.90) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98) for internal and external validation of the keratinocyte carcinoma risk model, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found validated independent risk factors for keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT that are enriched with host- compared with transplant-associated risk factors. These findings highlight the importance of assessing host-associated risk factors for keratinocyte carcinoma in patients eligible for alloHCT. Future studies should examine whether keratinocyte carcinoma risk stratification before alloHCT may inform long-term surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBasal Cell CarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSkinSkin NeoplasmsSkin Pigmentation

Identifiers

PMID32267479
PMCPMC7142796
OpenAlexW3015144434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.