Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32267235›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020

Nurse-Physician Communication Team Training in Virtual Reality Versus Live Simulations: Randomized Controlled Trial on Team Communication and Teamwork Attitudes.

Sok Ying Liaw, Sim Win Ooi, Khairul Dzakirin Bin Rusli, Tang Ching Lau, Wilson Wai San Tam, Wei Ling Chua

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04330924 (Nurse-Physician Communication Team Training in Virtual Reality Versus Live Simulations), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04330924 nacompletednot on this map

Nurse-Physician Communication Team Training in Virtual Reality Versus Live Simulations: Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of SingaporeRan2018 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsInterdisciplinary CommunicationArmsCreate Real-life Experience And Teamwork In Virtual Environment (CREATIVE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sok Ying LiawAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8326-4049
Sim Win OoiNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7020-5659
Khairul Dzakirin Bin RusliAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8096-0006
Tang Ching LauYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1810-0926
Wilson Wai San TamAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-3060
Wei Ling ChuaAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-2728
National University of Singapore · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional team training is needed to improve nurse-physician communication skills that are lacking in clinical practice. Using simulations has proven to be an effective learning approach for team training. Yet, it has logistical constraints that call for the exploration of virtual environments in delivering team training.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate a team training program using virtual reality vs conventional live simulations on medical and nursing students' communication skill performances and teamwork attitudes.

methodsIn June 2018, the authors implemented nurse-physician communication team training using communication tools. A randomized controlled trial study was conducted with 120 undergraduate medical and nursing students who were randomly assigned to undertake team training using virtual reality or live simulations. The participants from both groups were tested on their communication performances through team-based simulation assessments. Their teamwork attitudes were evaluated using interprofessional attitude surveys that were administered before, immediately after, and 2 months after the study interventions.

resultsThe team-based simulation assessment revealed no significant differences in the communication performance posttest scores (P=.29) between the virtual and simulation groups. Both groups reported significant increases in the interprofessional attitudes posttest scores from the baseline scores, with no significant differences found between the groups over the 3 time points.

conclusionsOur study outcomes did not show an inferiority of team training using virtual reality when compared with live simulations, which supports the potential use of virtual reality to substitute conventional simulations for communication team training. Future studies can leverage the use of artificial intelligence technology in virtual reality to replace costly human-controlled facilitators to achieve better scalability and sustainability of team-based training in interprofessional education.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04330924; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04330924.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelVirtual RealityAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleNursesPatient Care TeamPhysiciansProspective StudiesYoung Adultinterprofessional educationnurse-physician communicationsimulationteam trainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32267235
PMCPMC7177432
OpenAlexW3003260190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.