Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266876›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Investigating Health Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction Projects in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Andrea Farnham, Hermínio Cossa, Dominik Dietler, Rebecca Engebretsen, Andrea Leuenberger, Isaac Lyatuu, Belinda Nimako, Hyacinthe R Zabre, Fritz Brugger, Mirko S Winkler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Health Studies in the Context of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Inclusion of Health in Impact Assessment: A Review of Current Practice in Sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea FarnhamSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0830-0927
Hermínio CossaSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-2637
Dominik DietlerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-125X
Rebecca EngebretsenSwiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5986
Andrea LeuenbergerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-148X
Isaac LyatuuSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-7648
Belinda NimakoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-4481
Hyacinthe R ZabreSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-9680
Fritz BruggerSwiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1992-4492
Mirko S WinklerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-3863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural resource extraction projects offer both opportunities and risks for sustainable development and health in host communities. Often, however, the health of the community suffers. Health impact assessment (HIA) can mitigate the risks and promote the benefits of development but is not routinely done in the developing regions that could benefit the most.

objectiveOur study aims to investigate health and health determinants in regions affected by extractive industries in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania. The evidence generated in our study will inform a policy dialogue on how HIA can be promoted as a regulatory approach as part of the larger research initiative called the HIA4SD (Health impact assessment for sustainable development) project.

methodsThe study is a concurrent triangulation, mixed methods, multi-stage, multi-focus project that specifically addresses the topics of governance and policy, social determinants of health, health economics, health systems, maternal and child health, morbidity and mortality, and environmental determinants, as well as the associated health outcomes in natural resource extraction project settings across four countries. To investigate each of these health topics, the project will (1) use existing population-level databases to quantify incidence of disease and other health outcomes and determinants over time using time series analysis; (2) conduct two quantitative surveys on mortality and cost of disease in producer regions; and (3) collect primary qualitative data using focus groups and key informant interviews describing community perceptions of the impacts of extraction projects on health and partnership arrangements between the projects and local and national governance. Differences in health outcomes and health determinants between districts with and without an extraction project will be analyzed using matched geographical analyses in quasi-Poisson regression models and binomial regression models. Costs to the health system and to the households from diseases found to be associated with projects in each country will be estimated retrospectively.

resultsFieldwork for the study began in February 2019 and concluded in February 2020. At the time of submission, qualitative data collection had been completed in all four study countries. In Burkina Faso, 36 focus group discussions and 74 key informant interviews were conducted in three sites. In Ghana, 34 focus group discussions and 64 key informant interviews were conducted in three sites. In Mozambique, 75 focus group discussions and 103 key informant interviews were conducted in four sites. In Tanzania, 36 focus group discussions and 84 key informant interviews were conducted in three sites. Quantitative data extraction and collection is ongoing in all four study countries. Ethical approval for the study was received in all four study countries prior to beginning the fieldwork. Data analyses are underway and results are expected to be published in 2020 and 2021.

conclusionsDisentangling the complex interactions of resource extraction projects with their host communities requires an integrative approach drawing on many methodologies under the HIA umbrella. By using complementary data sources to address the question of population health in project areas from several angles, bias and missing data will be reduced, generating high-quality evidence to aid countries in moving toward sustainable development. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17138.

Indexed as

cost-benefitDHIS2DHSenvironmental healthextractive industryGIShealth impact assessmentmixed methodstime series

Identifiers

PMID32266876
PMCPMC7177430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.