Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266786›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2020

Comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy on wound infection and healing in complicated appendicitis.

Yılmaz Güler, Zülfikar Karabulut, Hasan Çaliş, Serkan Şengül

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yılmaz GülerDepartment of General Surgery, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Medical Faculty Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Zülfikar KarabulutDepartment of General Surgery, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Hasan ÇalişDepartment of General Surgery, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Serkan ŞengülDepartment of General Surgery, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Alanya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of laparoscopic and open surgery on the development of postoperative surgical wound infection and wound healing between complicated appendicitis patients. Patients with complicated appendicitis were divided into those underwent laparoscopic and open surgical procedures according to the surgical method. Patients were followed up with regard to development of any postoperative wound infection, and medical, radiological, and surgical treatment methods and results were recorded. A total of 363 patients who underwent appendectomy were examined, of which 103 (28.4%) had complicated appendicitis. Postoperative wound infection rate in patients who underwent open surgery was 15.9%, while it was 6.8% in the laparoscopic surgery group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of infection development rates (P > .05). The rate of surgical drainage use and rehospitalisation was significantly higher in the group with wound infection than in the group without wound infection. (P < .05). We suggest that in terms of wound infection and wound healing, laparoscopic surgery should be the method of choice for patients with complicated appendicitis. In order to reduce the frequency of wound infection, drains should not be kept for a long time in patients undergoing appendectomy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAppendectomyAppendicitisFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionTurkeyWound HealingYoung Adultcomplicated appendicitisinfectionlaparoscopic appendectomy

Identifiers

PMID32266786
PMCPMC7948792
OpenAlexW3014314913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.