Observational studyInternational wound journal2020
An observational pilot study using a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix to treat non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A purified reconstituted bilayer matrix shows improved outcomes in treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers when compared to the standard of care: Final results and analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-centre clinical trial.International wound journal · 2024Trial
- Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre clinical trial.International wound journal · 2022Trial
- Biochanin A enhances wound healing in diabetic rats: emphasis on antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, angiogenic and pro-collagen activities.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot risk screening scale for diabetic patients.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Therapeutic role of growth factors in treating diabetic wound.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Tissue Engineering-Based Strategies for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management.Advances in wound care · 2023Review
- Diabetic Wound-Healing Science.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Comment on "An observational pilot study using a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix to treat non-healing diabetic foot ulcers".International wound journal · 2021Article
- Comment on "An observational pilot study using a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix to treat non-healing diabetic foot ulcers".International wound journal · 2021Article
- Functional Properties of a Purified Reconstituted Bilayer Matrix Design Support Natural Wound Healing Activities.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- An observational pilot study using a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix to treat non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.International wound journal · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have significant clinical impact and carry a substantial economic burden. Patients with DFUs that are refractory to standard wound care are at risk for major complications, including infection and amputation and have an increased risk of mortality. This study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel decellularised purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) in treating DFUs. Ten diabetic patients with refractory wounds that failed to heal after at least 4 weeks of standard wound care were studied in this Institutional Review Board approved trial. Ten consecutive wounds were treated weekly with the PRBM for up to 12 weeks. At each weekly visit, the wound was evaluated, photographed, and cleaned, followed by application of new graft if not completely epithelialised. Assessment included measurement of the wound area and inspection of the wound site for signs of complications. The primary outcome measure was wound closure, as adjudicated by independent reviewers. Secondary outcomes included assessment of overall adverse events, time to closure, percent area reduction, and the cost of product(s) used. Nine of 10 patients achieved complete wound closure within 4 weeks, and 1 did not heal completely within 12 weeks. The mean time to heal was 2.7 weeks. The mean wound area reduction at 12 weeks was 99%. No adverse events nor wound complications were observed. These early clinical findings suggest that the PRBM may be an effective tool in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.