Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266774›Full record

Observational studyInternational wound journal2020

An observational pilot study using a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix to treat non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

David G Armstrong, Dennis P Orgill, Robert D Galiano, Paul M Glat, Jarrod P Kaufman, Marissa J Carter, Charles M Zelen

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase ReportsObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diabetic Wound-Healing Science.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

David G ArmstrongDivision of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dennis P OrgillDivision of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Robert D GalianoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Paul M GlatProfessor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jarrod P KaufmanDepartment of Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine and McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Marissa J CarterStrategic Solutions, Inc, Cody, Wyoming, USA.
Charles M ZelenProfessional Education and Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-7056
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USGlobal Strategic Solutions (United States) · USNorthwestern University · USProfessional Education and Research Institute · USSt. Christopher's Hospital for Children · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
STRUCTURAL STUDIES IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMP01AG000001 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENE, DOUGLAS L · 1985 to 2013
$20.7M
Geistlich Pharma AG 0001NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NIA NIH HHS P01 AG000001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have significant clinical impact and carry a substantial economic burden. Patients with DFUs that are refractory to standard wound care are at risk for major complications, including infection and amputation and have an increased risk of mortality. This study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel decellularised purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) in treating DFUs. Ten diabetic patients with refractory wounds that failed to heal after at least 4 weeks of standard wound care were studied in this Institutional Review Board approved trial. Ten consecutive wounds were treated weekly with the PRBM for up to 12 weeks. At each weekly visit, the wound was evaluated, photographed, and cleaned, followed by application of new graft if not completely epithelialised. Assessment included measurement of the wound area and inspection of the wound site for signs of complications. The primary outcome measure was wound closure, as adjudicated by independent reviewers. Secondary outcomes included assessment of overall adverse events, time to closure, percent area reduction, and the cost of product(s) used. Nine of 10 patients achieved complete wound closure within 4 weeks, and 1 did not heal completely within 12 weeks. The mean time to heal was 2.7 weeks. The mean wound area reduction at 12 weeks was 99%. No adverse events nor wound complications were observed. These early clinical findings suggest that the PRBM may be an effective tool in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes MellitusDiabetic FootFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPolymersProspective StudiesSkin TransplantationTreatment OutcomeWound HealingPolymers

Identifiers

PMID32266774
PMCPMC7384195
OpenAlexW3015009971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.