ArticleAnnals of intensive care2020
Ocular microvascular changes in patients with sepsis: a prospective observational study.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04214743 (Ocular Microvascular Changes in Patients With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ocular Microvascular Changes in Patients With Sepsis
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular features in sepsis - a scoping review.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Ocular diseases and their association with mortality in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective cohort study from the MIMIC-IV database.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Retinal Perfusion and Injury in Sepsis and after Major Surgery.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Reversible impairment of non-invasively assessed mitochondrial oxygen metabolism in the long-term course of patients with sepsis: a prospective monocentric cohort study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Retinal vascular calibers and correlations with biomarkers in bitches with pyometra-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Ozone exposure and increased risk of age-related macular degeneration: Evidence from nationwide cohort and toxicological studies.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of sepsis-induced acute liver injury: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Multimodal Eye Imaging, Retina Characteristics, and Psychological Assessment Dataset.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Evaluating the relationship between ocular blood flow and systemic organ blood flow in hemorrhagic shock using a rabbit model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Novelties in the evaluation of microcirculation in septic shock.Journal of intensive medicine · 2023Review
- Optical coherence tomography angiography as a surrogate marker for end-organ resuscitation in sepsis: A review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Laser speckle contrast imaging to monitor microcirculation: An effective method to predict outcome in patients with sepsis and septic shock.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Retinal blood flow in critical illness and systemic disease: a review.Annals of intensive care · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the study was to detect differences in the conjunctival microcirculation between septic patients and healthy subjects and to evaluate the course of conjunctival and retinal microvasculature in survivors and non-survivors over a 24-h period of time.
methodsThis single-center prospective observational study was performed in mixed ICU in a tertiary teaching hospital. We included patients with sepsis or septic shock within the first 24 h after ICU admission. Conjunctival imaging, using an IDF video microscope, and retinal imaging, using portable digital fundus camera, as well as systemic hemodynamic measurements, were performed at three time points: at baseline, 6 h and 24 h. Baseline conjunctival microcirculatory parameters were compared with healthy controls.
resultsA total of 48 patients were included in the final assessment and analysis. Median APACHE II and SOFA scores were 16[12-21] and 10[7-12], respectively. Forty-four (92%) patients were in septic shock, 48 (100%) required mechanical ventilation. 19 (40%) patients were discharged alive from the intensive care unit. We found significant reductions in all microcirculatory parameters in the conjunctiva when comparing septic and healthy subjects. In addition, we observed a significant lower microvascular flow index (MFI) of small conjunctival vessels during all three time points in non-survivors compared with survivors. However, retinal arteriolar vessels were not different between survivors and non-survivors.
conclusionsConjunctival microvascular blood flow was altered in septic patients. In the 24-h observation period conjunctival small vessels had a significantly higher MFI, but no difference in retinal arteriolar diameter in survivors in comparison with non-survivors. Trial registration NCT04214743, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 31 December 2019 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04214743.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.