Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266557›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Association of combination opioid, benzodiazepine, and muscle relaxant usage with emergency department visits in a nationwide cohort in the United States.

Jonathan Hirohiko Watanabe, Jincheng Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Overview of this issue: "Pain management in an opioid crisis".International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan Hirohiko WatanabeDivision of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0657, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0657, USA. jhwatanabe@ucsd.edu.
Jincheng YangDivision of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0657, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0657, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine use ("double-threat") and opioid, benzodiazepine, and muscle relaxant use ("triple-threat") are linked to increased adverse events compared to opioid use alone. Objectives To assess prevalence of double-threat and triple-threat in the US and to measure association between double- and triple-threat and emergency department visits. Setting Nationally representative, 2-year health database of the United States. Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the national medical expenditure panel survey. Two-year prevalence of combination use was measured. Association between 2013-2014 double- and triple-threat exposure and emergency department visit compared to non-users, opioid-users, and all other exposure combinations assessed using logistic regression. Main outcome measures Survey-weighted prevalence of triple-threat and double-threat in 2013 and 2014 was measured. The outcome variable of at least one emergency department visit in a study year was utilized for the logistic regression. Results Opioids, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants were used in 11.9% (38.4 million lives), 4.2% (13.5 million), and 3.4% (10.9 million) individuals respectively in 2013, and 12.2% (39.3 million), 4.6% (14.8 million), and 3.6% (11.6 million), respectively in 2014. Prevalence of individuals on double-threat rose from 1.6 to 1.9% from 2013 to 2014. Triple-threat prevalence was unchanged at 0.53% in that interval. Triple-threat patients had increased emergency department visit probability with ORs of 9.19 (95% CI 9.17-9.22) in 2013, 9.82 (95% CI 9.79-9.85) in 2014, and 5.90 (95% CI 5.89-5.92) for longitudinal 2013-2014 analysis compared to non-users. Double-threat patients had increased emergency department visit probability with ORs of 4.57 (95% CI 4.56-4.58) in 2013, 6.66 (95% CI 6.65-6.68) in 2014, and 4.49 (95% CI 4.48-4.50) for 2013-2014 analysis compared to non-users. Conclusions Concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine use and opioid, benzodiazepine, and muscle relaxant use increased probability of emergency department visit. Amplified efforts in surveillance, prescribing, and default follow-up for concurrent opioid, benzodiazepine, muscle relaxant use are needed to reduce this public health concern.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMusclesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesBenzodiazepineCombined useEmergency visitsMuscle relaxantOpioidPotentailly inappropriate medicationsUnited States of America

Identifiers

PMID32266557
OpenAlexW3014426714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.