Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266540›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2021

Natural history of most common spinocerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alhassane Diallo, Heike Jacobi, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, Thomas Klockgether

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Early and Progressive Spinal Cord Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Capture of Longitudinal Change in Real-Life Walking in Cerebellar Ataxia Increases Patient Relevance and Effect Size.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alhassane Diallo *INSERM, U1137, CIC-EC 1425, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical Research, AP-HP, Hospital Bichat, University Paris Diderot Paris, Paris, France. alhassane.diallo@inserm.fr.
Heike Jacobi *Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sophie Tezenas du MontcelSorbonne Universités, INSERM U 1136, Institut Pierre Louis D'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, AP-HP, Hopitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, 75013, Paris, France.
Thomas KlockgetherGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorders that lead to severe disability and premature death.

objectiveTo better characterize the natural history of the most common SCAs, SCA1, SCA2, SCA3 and SCA6, we performed a meta-analysis of literature to determine disease progression, provide data for sample-sizes calculations for interventional trials and study the impact of geographical locations and study follow-up on disease progression.

methodsA systematic literature search from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for longitudinal natural history studies of SCA patients was conducted. Studies using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating Ataxia (SARA) as outcome measure were considered. Random-effect (RE) meta-analysis was applied to estimate pooled disease progression.

resultsSix studies with 1215 SCA patients enrolled between 2005 and 2016 were finally selected. Annual pooled SARA score increase was 1.83 (1.46-2.20) in patients with SCA1, 1.40 (1.19-1.61) in patients with SCA2, 1.41 (0.97-1.84) in patients with SCA3, and 0.81 (0.66-0.97) in patients with SCA6. For patients with SCA3, disease progression was faster in studies located in Asia and Europe than in the US. Two-arm interventional trials of 1-year duration to achieve 80% power and α level of 5% would require 92 patients per group with SCA1, 97 with SCA2, 115 with SCA3, and 430 with SCA6 to detect a 50% reduction in disease progression.

conclusionThis meta-analysis provides quantitative data on the progression of the most common spinocerebellar ataxias based on patient numbers that exceed those of previous studies and confirms that disease progression is faster in SCA1, intermediate in SCA2 and SCA3 and slower in SCA6, with similar rates of disease progression in SCA2 and SCA3 between different populations, suggesting a possibility of international collaborative studies. Nevertheless, individual-patient data meta-analysis is needed to better understand the risk factors that influence disease progression and improve patient stratification in interventional trials.

Indexed as

Spinocerebellar AtaxiasDisease ProgressionEuropeHumansRisk FactorsLongitudinal dataMeta-analysisNatural historyReviewSpinocerebellar ataxia

Identifiers

PMID32266540
OpenAlexW3014806123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.