Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266532›Full record

Trial reportArchives of dermatological research2020

Daylight photodynamic therapy for the management of actinic cheilitis.

Dimitrios Andreadis, Achilleia -Maria Pavlou, Efstratios Vakirlis, Eleftherios Anagnostou, Fotini Vrani, Athanasios Poulopoulos, Alexandros Kolokotronis, Dimitrios Ioannidis, Elena Sotiriou

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of dermatological research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Actinic cheilitis or discoid lupus erythematosus?Archives of dermatological research · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitrios AndreadisDepartment of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. dandrea@dent.auth.gr.
Achilleia -Maria PavlouDepartment of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Efstratios VakirlisFirst Dermatology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleftherios AnagnostouDepartment of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Fotini VraniFirst Dermatology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Athanasios PoulopoulosDepartment of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Alexandros KolokotronisDepartment of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitrios IoannidisFirst Dermatology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Elena SotiriouFirst Dermatology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification and adequate treatment of actinic cheilitis (AC), which affects the lower lip vermillion and is considered a precursor of squamous cell carcinoma, is mandatory. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been successfully used in AC. PDT with the use of daylight (DLPDT) is equally effective and more convenient than the conventional PDT. Data on short and long-term efficacy of DLPDT in AC are limited. Our primary purpose was to assess efficacy of DLPDT in AC as well as safety and tolerance. Twenty-two individuals with histologically confirmed AC received 2 MAL (5-aminolevulinic acid)-DLPDT sessions 1 week apart. Patients were evaluated clinically 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Non-complete responders were biopsied and excluded from the study if histological alterations were indicative of AC. Adverse events were recorded from baseline to the end of the 12-month follow-up period. Twenty patients completed the study. Overall, complete clinical response 12 months after treatment was 80% (16/20), while an association between treatment response and grade of dysplasia was observed (p = 0.016). With respect to response by grade, complete clinical response achieved in grade I AC was 100% (12/12) and 50% (4/8) in grade II AC. Main adverse events included mild erythema, oedema, and scaling, with no pain associated with DLPDT. According to our results, DLPDT seems to be of significant benefit for the treatment of grade I AC. Combination with the other treatment modalities could improve the efficacy in grade II AC. Further studies are needed for the assessment of late recurrences.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAminolevulinic AcidCarcinoma, Squamous CellCheilitisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLip NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPrecancerous ConditionsSkin CreamTreatment OutcomeAminolevulinic Aciddelta-aminolevulinic acid methyl esterPhotosensitizing AgentsActinic cheilitisDaylightDaylight photodynamic therapyPhotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID32266532
OpenAlexW3014143020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.