ArticleHeart and vessels2020
Differences in treatment and prognosis by the experience of falls or bone fracture in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may differ by the experience of fall or bone fracture. However, their current status is still unclear. From our institute database between 2010 and 2015, 674 AF patients with age ≥ 70 years were selected and were divided into those who experienced fall or fracture during the observation period (F/F group; n = 49) and those who did not (non-F/F group; n = 625). We compared the treatment and prognosis between the 2 groups. Patients in the F/F group were older (79 vs 76 years, P < 0.001) and had more comorbidities compared with those in the non-F/F group. The prescription rate of oral anticoagulant was similar between the two groups (77.6% vs 68.2%, P = 0.201), where warfarin was predominant. The F/F group was not associated with higher incidence of ischemic stroke. The F/F group was associated with a higher incidence of heart failure events (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.88; 95% confidence intervals (Cl) 1.70-8.85; P = 0.001), and cardiovascular events (OR 3.43; 95% Cl 1.71-6.85; P < 0.001). In elderly AF patients in a cardiovascular hospital, the experience of fall or fracture did not affect the prescription of oral anticoagulants and the incidence of ischemic stroke, but it was significantly associated with increase of heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.