Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266441›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020

Modeling the effect of brain growth on cranial bones using finite-element analysis and geometric morphometrics.

Jimena Barbeito-Andrés, Noelia Bonfili, Jordi Marcé Nogué, Valeria Bernal, Paula N Gonzalez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jimena Barbeito-AndrésConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, La Plata, Argentina.
Noelia BonfiliFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Jordi Marcé NoguéCentrum für Naturkunde, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luter-King-Platz 3, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Valeria BernalConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, La Plata, Argentina.
Paula N GonzalezConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, La Plata, Argentina. paulan.gonza@gmail.com.
Centro Científico Tecnológico - La Plata · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstitut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont · ESUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

ANCyT PICT 2134ANCyT PIP 1810CONICET PIP 0729Forschungskreis der Ernährungsindustrie (DE) KA 1525/9-2Universidad Nacional de La Plata PI 787Universidad Nacional de La Plata PI 792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrain expansion during ontogeny has been identified as a key factor for explaining the growth pattern of neurocranial bones. However, the dynamics of this relation are only partially understood and a detailed characterization of integrated morphological changes of the brain and the neurocranium along ontogeny is still lacking. The aim of this study was to model the effect of brain growth on cranial bones by means of finite-element analysis (FEA) and geometric morphometric techniques.

methodsFirst, we described the postnatal changes in brain size and shape by digitizing coordinates of 3D semilandmarks on cranial endocasts, as a proxy of brain, segmented from CT-scans of an ontogenetic sample. Then, two scenarios of brain growth were simulated: one in which brain volume increases with the same magnitude in all directions, and other that includes the information on the relative expansion of brain regions obtained from morphometric analysis.

resultsResults indicate that in the first model, in which a uniform pressure is applied, the largest displacements were localized in the sutures, especially in the anterior and posterior fontanels, as well as the metopic suture. When information of brain relative growth was introduced into the model, displacements were also concentrated in the lambda region although the values along both sides of the neurocranium (parietal and temporal bones) were larger than under the first scenario.

conclusionIn sum, we propose a realistic approach to the use of FEA based on morphometric data that offered different results to more simplified models.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAnatomic LandmarksBrainChildChild, PreschoolFinite Element AnalysisHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantInfant, NewbornOrgan SizeSkullTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyEndocastNeurocraniumShape variation

Identifiers

PMID32266441
OpenAlexW3014620031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.