Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266437›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network.

M K Javaid, A Sami, W Lems, P Mitchell, T Thomas, A Singer, R Speerin, M Fujita, D D Pierroz, K Akesson and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Short- and long-term prognostic factors associated with functional recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture: A systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Association of orthogeriatric care models with evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. DXA in post-fracture care: gatekeeper or facilitator?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Impact of a national reimbursement add-on policy on refracture risk and secondary fracture prevention after hip fracture in Japan: a population-based interrupted time series analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Beyond the fracture: coordinated action for bone health equity in Africa.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

M K JavaidThe Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK. Kassim.javaid@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
A SamiThe Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK.
W LemsVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P MitchellThe Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK.
T ThomasDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, and INSERM U1059, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France.
A SingerDepartment of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
R SpeerinFragility Fracture Network, Zürich, Switzerland.
M FujitaInternational Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland.
D D PierrozInternational Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland.
K AkessonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
P HalboutInternational Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland.
S FerrariDivision of Bone Disease, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
C CooperThe Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLGeorgetown University · USHôpital Nord · FRSkåne University Hospital · SEUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Capture the Fracture® Campaign with the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) has developed eleven patient-level key performance indicators (KPIs) for fracture liaison services (FLSs) to guide quality improvement.

introductionFracture Liaison Services (FLSs) are recommended worldwide to reduce fracture risk after a sentinel fracture. Given not every FLS is automatically effective, the IOF Capture the Fracture working group has developed and implemented the Best Practice Framework to assess the organisational components of an FLS. We have now developed a complimentary KPI set that extends this assessment of performance to the patient level.

methodsThe Capture the Fracture working group in collaboration with the Fragility Fracture Network Secondary Fragility Fracture Special Interest Group and National Osteoporosis Foundation adapted existing metrics from the UK-based Fracture Liaison Service Database Audit to develop a patient-level KPI set for FLSs.

resultsEleven KPIs were selected. The proportion of patients: with non-spinal fractures; with spine fractures (detected clinically and radiologically); assessed for fracture risk within 12 weeks of sentinel fracture; having DXA assessment within 12 weeks of sentinel fracture; having falls risk assessment; recommended anti-osteoporosis medication; commenced of strength and balance exercise intervention within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; monitored within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; started anti-osteoporosis medication within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; prescribed anti-osteoporosis medication 52 weeks after sentinel fracture. The final KPI measures data completeness for each of the other KPIs. For these indicators, levels of achievement were set at the < 50%, 50-80% and > 80% levels except for treatment recommendation where a level of 50% was used.

conclusionThis KPI set compliments the existing Best Practice Framework to support FLSs to examine their own performance using patient-level data. By using this KPI set for local quality improvement cycles, FLSs will be able to efficiently realise the full potential of secondary fracture prevention and improved clinical outcomes for their local populations.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesHumansQuality ImprovementSecondary PreventionBone Density Conservation AgentsFracture Liaison Service/FLSKey performance indicatorsOsteoporosisQuality improvementSecondary fracture prevention

Identifiers

PMID32266437
PMCPMC7280347
OpenAlexW3014966512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.