ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Custom-made acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Custom-Made Monoflange Acetabular Component for Revision Hip Arthroplasty in Paprosky Type IIIA Defect: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Personalized digital simulation‑assisted acetabular component implantation in revision hip arthroplasty.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Patient Specific Instruments and Patient Individual Implants-A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Custom Made Monoflange Acetabular Components for the Treatment of Paprosky Type III Defects.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of acetabular bone loss is a demanding problem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
objectivesThe aim of this review is to introduce and discuss the results and the advantages and disadvantages of custom-made implants as a treatment option for severe acetabular bone defects. MATERIALS AND
methodsA selective review of the existing literature of custom made acetabular implants was performed on PubMed.
resultsStudies showed good clinical and radiological outcomes of custom made acetabular implants and a survival rate of more than 90%.
conclusionCustom-made acetabular implants are a reliable treatment option for severe acetabular defects and allow the reconstruction of the centre of rotation of the hip. The costs of these implants are high and planning is time consuming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.