ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2020
Canard-induced complex oscillations in an excitatory network.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple-timescale dynamics, mixed mode oscillations and mixed affective states in a model of bipolar disorder.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Classification of bursting patterns: A tale of two ducks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Review
- Canard solutions in neural mass models: consequences on critical regimes.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2021Article
- Neural mass modeling of slow-fast dynamics of seizure initiation and abortion.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Neuroscience, mathematical modelling involving multiple spatial and temporal scales can unveil complex oscillatory activity such as excitable responses to an input current, subthreshold oscillations, spiking or bursting. While the number of slow and fast variables and the geometry of the system determine the type of the complex oscillations, canard structures define boundaries between them. In this study, we use geometric singular perturbation theory to identify and characterise boundaries between different dynamical regimes in multiple-timescale firing rate models of the developing spinal cord. These rate models are either three or four dimensional with state variables chosen within an overall group of two slow and two fast variables. The fast subsystem corresponds to a recurrent excitatory network with fast activity-dependent synaptic depression, and the slow variables represent the cell firing threshold and slow activity-dependent synaptic depression, respectively. We start by demonstrating canard-induced bursting and mixed-mode oscillations in two different three-dimensional rate models. Then, in the full four-dimensional model we show that a canard-mediated slow passage creates dynamics that combine these complex oscillations and give rise to mixed-mode bursting oscillations (MMBOs). We unveil complicated isolas along which MMBOs exist in parameter space. The profile of solutions along each isola undergoes canard-mediated transitions between the sub-threshold regime and the bursting regime; these explosive transitions change the number of oscillations in each regime. Finally, we relate the MMBO dynamics to experimental recordings and discuss their effects on the silent phases of bursting patterns as well as their potential role in creating subthreshold fluctuations that are often interpreted as noise. The mathematical framework used in this paper is relevant for modelling multiple timescale dynamics in excitable systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.