Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32266347›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2019

YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis.

Kyle N Kunze, Matthew R Cohn, Connor Wakefield, Fadi Hamati, Robert F LaPrade, Brian Forsythe, Adam B Yanke, Jorge Chahla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Malignant and Benign Primary Bone Tumors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Informational Quality of YouTube Content on Partial Meniscectomy Remains Inadequate.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  8. YouTube Videos on Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Lack Accuracy and Quality.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  9. Bias Toward Surgical Treatment of Acromioclavicular Injuries Exists on YouTube.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle N KunzeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Matthew R CohnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Connor WakefieldDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Fadi HamatiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Robert F LaPradeThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.
Brian ForsytheDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Adam B YankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Rush University Medical Center · USSteadman Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and educational content of YouTube videos concerning injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) of the knee.

methodsThe first 50 videos specific to the PCL identified through the YouTube query

resultsThe mean number of views per video was 50,477.9 ± 15,036. Collectively, the 50 videos were viewed 14,141,285 times. Video content was classified primarily as information about disease (62.0%). The most common upload sources were physicians (24.0%) and nonphysician health care providers (26.0%). Significant between-group interactions were found between video source and the JAMA score, with physicians and medical sources having significantly higher mean JAMA scores (

conclusionsVideos concerning the PCL were frequently viewed on YouTube, but the educational quality and reliability of these videos were low. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physicians and health care providers treating PCL pathology should take the initiative to counsel patients about which outside resources are reliable to better inform patients about their treatment decisions. With regard to YouTube videos specifically, providers should caution their patients that this source of information may be unreliable.

Identifiers

PMID32266347
PMCPMC7120836
OpenAlexW2990261396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.