ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2020
Perianal Disease and Granulomas: Think Out of the Box….
Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic granulomatous disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a primary immunodeficiency due to a malfunction of NADPH oxidase. It is characterized by recurrent and severe infections caused by catalase-positive microorganisms and autoinflammatory manifestations. Recently, there has been described an CASE: A 15-year-old girl with vulvar lichen planus since she was 2 years old and suspected Crohn's disease (CD) was first seen at our hospital. At the age of 12 years, she had been submitted to sacrococcygeal cyst exeresis, without cicatrization of the surgical wound and extension of the lesion to the perianal area. The diagnosis of CD was questioned, and the patient underwent an endoscopic and radiologic assessment, which was normal. A skin biopsy from the perianal area revealed a granuloma; thus, CD with isolated perianal disease was assumed. After several different treatments including antibiotics, infliximab, and adalimumab, the perianal lesion persisted, with no associated gastrointestinal symptoms. Therefore, the hypothesis of an immunodeficiency was considered. An immunologic and genetic study revealed reduced oxidative burst in the phorbol myristate acetate test, with diminished reactive oxygen species production and a homozygous mutation in the
conclusionsThe present case highlights that alternative diagnoses to CD must be considered in the presence of isolated perianal disease with granulomatous inflammation, especially when the disease is refractory to conventional CD therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.