ArticleFrontiers in medicine2020
Patient Centricity in Patient Preference Studies: The Patient Perspective.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Critical Success Factors for Successful Implementation of Healthcare 4.0: A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Translational human gut microbiome research: What are the missing pieces of the puzzle?Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Decentralized clinical trials in cardiovascular disease : A primer for clinical trialists.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Review
- Arabic translation and psychometric validation of the Problem-Solving Decision-Making scale: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Designing a Patient Preference Study on Subcutaneous Medical Devices: Incorporating Health Authority Scientific Advice and Patient Perspectives.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Which questionnaires can be used to elicit patients' preferences regarding patient-provider consultations? Results of a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring Patient Preference Information in Clinical Research and Decision Models: An Investigative Survey.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Measure Treatment Satisfaction in Drug Development.The patient · 2024Article
- Article
- Barriers and facilitators in developing patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - qualitative interviews on experiences of international guideline producers.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The Needs of Patients With Chronic Disease in Transitional Care From Hospital to Home in Sudan: A Qualitative Study.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Exploring the outcomes of research engagement using the observation method in an online setting.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Patients as research partners in preference studies: learnings from IMI-PREFER.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Using Patient Perspectives to Inform Better Clinical Trial Design and Conduct: Current Trends and Future Directions.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2023Review
- Patient Preferences for Cardiac Rehabilitation - A Systematic Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Review
- Patient Preferences to Assess Value IN Gene Therapies: Protocol Development for the PAVING Study in Hemophilia.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Treatment preferences in relation to fatigue of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A discrete choice experiment.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.