ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020
Safety and effectiveness of apatinib in patients with previously treated metastatic gastric cancer: a sub-analysis from the real-world study of apatinib for gastric cancer treatment (AHEAD-G202).
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib for Elderly Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer After Failure of at Least First-Line Chemotherapy: A Multi-Center, Single-Arm, Phase II Study.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Trial
- The alkylglycerone phosphate synthase sustains the resistance of gastric cancer cells to ferroptosis induced by Apatinib.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Combined with Irinotecan in HER2-negative Patients with Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma after First-Line Treatment Failure: A Single-Arm, Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy in advanced primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Phase I trial of apatinib and paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+5-FU/levoleucovorin for treatment-naïve advanced gastric cancer.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Clinical progress of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy and combination therapy for gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- The efficacy of oxaliplatin, surufatinib, and camrelizumab on neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Safety and effectiveness of apatinib in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a sub-analysis from the large-scale, prospective observational study of apatinib for gastric cancer treatment in a real-world clinical setting (AHEAD-G202).Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- The evolving strategies for the management of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A narrative review and expert opinion.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Efficacy and Response Biomarkers of Apatinib in the Treatment of Malignancies in China: A Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apatinib, a VEGFR2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed survival benefits in Asian patients with heavily pretreated advanced gastric cancer. However, the adverse event (AEs) profile of apatinib has limited its use. Dosing schedules are used to alleviate toxicities despite no supportive evidence. This study aimed to analyze the toxicity and effectiveness of apatinib alone, especially with different dosing strategies in advanced gastric cancer patients under a real-world setting. Data from the subpopulation of patients who failed ≥2 chemotherapy regimens enrolled in the AHEAD-G202 trial were analyzed. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Totally 120 patients were included into three groups by the initial daily doses: 43 (35.8%) patients in the low-dose (250 mg) group, 67 (55.8%) patients in the mid-dose (425 mg to 500 mg) group, and 10 (8.3%) patients in the high-dose (675 to 850 mg) group. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs were infrequent (<5%), with the most commonly reported grade 3/4 AEs being hand-foot syndrome (4.2%), hypertension (4.2%,), fatigue (4.2%), and difficulty in swallowing (4.2%) which gradually decreased among the high-, mid-, and low-dose groups. The median OS and PFS were 6.33 months (95% CI, 4.57-7.73) and 3.83 months (95% CI: 1.40-4.20), respectively and were comparable among the three doses groups. We found heavily pretreated advanced gastric cancer patients can tolerate and benefit from lower-doses of apatinib therapy. The lower initial daily dosing strategy represents an alternative approach for optimizing apatinib dosing in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32266105PMC7136926W3014625417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.