Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265983›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Comparison of SNP Calling Pipelines and NGS Platforms to Predict the Genomic Regions Harboring Candidate Genes for Nodulation in Cultivated Peanut.

Ze Peng, Zifan Zhao, Josh Paul Clevenger, Ye Chu, Dev Paudel, Peggy Ozias-Akins, Jianping Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding the genetics of quality traits in groundnut: GWAS highlights drought-responsive markers and candidate genes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CAPG: comprehensive allopolyploid genotyper.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ze PengAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Zifan ZhaoAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Josh Paul ClevengerCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Ye ChuGenetic and Genomics and Department of Horticulture, Institute of Plant Breeding, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia.
Dev PaudelAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Peggy Ozias-AkinsGenetic and Genomics and Department of Horticulture, Institute of Plant Breeding, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia.
Jianping WangAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated peanut (

Indexed as

genotyping by sequencingnodulationpeanutRNA sequencingsingle nucleotide polymorphismSNP arraytarget enrichment sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32265983
PMCPMC7105825
OpenAlexW3012839963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.