Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265954›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Efficient Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Homozygous/Biallelic

Hailing Zhang, Yingping Cao, Huan Zhang, Yue Xu, Chuanen Zhou, Wenwen Liu, Ruifen Zhu, Chen Shang, Jikai Li, Zhongbao Shen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biochemical analysis of the TPS-a subfamily inFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Highly efficientFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  19. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hailing ZhangGrass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Yingping CaoShandong Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Huan ZhangQingdao Tianyun Ecological Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China.
Yue XuShandong Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Chuanen ZhouThe Key Laboratory of Plant Development and Environmental Adaptation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Wenwen LiuShandong Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Ruifen ZhuGrass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Chen ShangGrass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Jikai LiGrass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Zhongbao ShenGrass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Siyi GuoCollaborative Innovation Center of Crop Stress Biology, Henan Province and Institute of Plant Stress Biology, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Zhubing HuCollaborative Innovation Center of Crop Stress Biology, Henan Province and Institute of Plant Stress Biology, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Chunxiang FuShandong Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Dequan SunGrass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNHenan University · CNQingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of acquiring mutants mediated by CRISPR/Cas9, plantlets are often regenerated from both mutated and non-mutated cells in a random manner, which increase the odds of chimeric mutated plant. In general, it's necessary to infect more explants or grow to next generation for the need of generating more biallelic or homozygous mutants. In present study, an efficient way of obtaining biallelic or homozygous mutated lines via fast-growing hairy root system without increasing numbers of infected explants or prolonging sexual propagation generation is reported. The fast growing lateral branches of hair roots are originated deep within the parental root from a small number of founder cells at the periphery, and therefore were employed as a library that classify different editing types in different lateral branches in which the homozygous or biallelic lines were screened. Here,

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9genome editinghairy roothomozygous/biallelic mutantMedicago truncatula

Identifiers

PMID32265954
PMCPMC7105802
OpenAlexW3013782352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.