ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020
Test of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Space-driven ROS in cells: a hidden danger to astronaut health and food safety.NPJ microgravity · 2025Review
- Light has a principal role in the Arabidopsis transcriptomic response to the spaceflight environment.NPJ microgravity · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic dynamics in the transition from ground to space are revealed by Virgin Galactic human-tended suborbital spaceflight.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Microbial applications for sustainable space exploration beyond low Earth orbit.NPJ microgravity · 2023Review
- Meta-analysis of the space flight and microgravity response of the Arabidopsis plant transcriptome.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Integrative transcriptomics and proteomics profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Utilizing the KSC Fixation Tube to Conduct Human-Tended Plant Biology Experiments on a Suborbital Spaceflight.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recent transcriptomic studies to elucidate the plant adaptive response to spaceflight and to simulated space environments.iScience · 2022Review
- Plants grown in Apollo lunar regolith present stress-associated transcriptomes that inform prospects for lunar exploration.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Response ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Conducting Plant Experiments in Space and on the Moon.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Plant Gravitropism: From Mechanistic Insights into Plant Function on Earth to Plants Colonizing Other Worlds.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Rad-Bio-App: a discovery environment for biologists to explore spaceflight-related radiation exposures.NPJ microgravity · 2021Article
- NASA GeneLab: interfaces for the exploration of space omics data.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Epigenomic RegulatorsFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Metabolomics Analysis in Different Development Stages on SP0 Generation of Rice Seeds After Spaceflight.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- A New Era for Space Life Science: International Standards for Space Omics Processing.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in the routine access to space along with increasing opportunities to perform plant growth experiments on board the International Space Station have led to an ever-increasing body of transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenomic data from plants experiencing spaceflight. These datasets hold great promise to help understand how plant biology reacts to this unique environment. However, analyses that mine across such expanses of data are often complex to implement, being impeded by the sheer number of potential comparisons that are possible. Complexities in how the output of these multiple parallel analyses can be presented to the researcher in an accessible and intuitive form provides further barriers to such research. Recent developments in computational systems biology have led to rapid advances in interactive data visualization environments designed to perform just such tasks. However, to date none of these tools have been tailored to the analysis of the broad-ranging plant biology spaceflight data. We have therefore developed the Test Of Arabidopsis Space Transcriptome (TOAST) database (https://astrobiology.botany.wisc.edu/astrobotany-toast) to address this gap in our capabilities. TOAST is a relational database that uses the Qlik database management software to link plant biology, spaceflight-related omics datasets, and their associated metadata. This environment helps visualize relationships across multiple levels of experiments in an easy to use gene-centric platform. TOAST draws on data from The US National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) GeneLab and other data repositories and also connects results to a suite of web-based analytical tools to facilitate further investigation of responses to spaceflight and related stresses. The TOAST graphical user interface allows for quick comparisons between plant spaceflight experiments using real-time, gene-specific queries, or by using functional gene ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway, or other filtering systems to explore genetic networks of interest. Testing of the database shows that TOAST confirms patterns of gene expression already highlighted in the literature, such as revealing the modulation of oxidative stress-related responses across multiple plant spaceflight experiments. However, this data exploration environment can also drive new insights into patterns of spaceflight responsive gene expression. For example, TOAST analyses highlight changes to mitochondrial function as likely shared responses in many plant spaceflight experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.